Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820

HiSilicon Kirin 810

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 810

The HiSilicon Kirin 810 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2019 and contains 8 processor cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.27 GHz and six small power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.88 GHz (bigLITTLE). Furthermore, the SoC integrates a mid range graphics card called ARM Mali-G52 MP6 with 6 clusters. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 810 integrates a Ascend D100 Lite NPU (Da Vinci architecture). The integrates LTE modem supports Cat.12/13 with Dual Sim VoLTE. For photography, the Kirin 810 integrates the Kirin ISP4.0. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X at up to 2133 MHz. Furthermore, WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 5.0 are integrated in the chip.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 820

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 820

The HiSilicon Kirin 820 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2020 and contains 8 processor cores. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 core with up to 2.36 GHz, three addition A76 cores at up to 2.22 (as the old Kirin 810) and four efficiency Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.88 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a 5G modem and a fast mid-range ARM Mali-G57 MP6 graphics card. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 820 integrates a DaVinci NPU.

The performance of the CPU part in our tests was slightly higher than the old Kirin 810 (thanks to the fast performance core). Huawei advertises 27% performance advantage for the CPU. The NPU and GPU have bigger performance gains with 73% and 38% more power.

The chip should also integrate Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 6.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 810HiSilicon Kirin 820
SeriesHiSilicon HiSilicon
CodenameCortex-A76/-A55Cortex-A76/-A55
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8201.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e compare1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 « 1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 « 1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e compare1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8101.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Clock1880 - 2270 MHz1840 - 2360 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm7 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A55 (1.88 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 1400 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 200 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 5, WiFi a/b/g/n/ac, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 1x Cortex-A76 up to 2.36 GHz, 3x A76 nup to 2.2 GHz, 4x A55 up to 1.84 GHz, big.LITTLE, 5G TDD/FDD, Bluetooth 5, WiFi 6, AGPS, Glonass, Baidou
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP6ARM Mali-G57 MP6
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.hisilicon.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810
0.7 pt (53%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 820
0.9 pt (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 18123     avg: 23401     median: 24426 (21%)     max: 27654 Points
41610 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3501     avg: 3731     median: 3720 (44%)     max: 3972 Points
4642 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3463     avg: 3749     median: 3782 (43%)     max: 4003 Points
4637 Points (53%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 592     avg: 598     median: 598 (25%)     max: 604 Points
642 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1890     avg: 1920     median: 1919.5 (3%)     max: 1949 Points
2434 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2836 Points (28%)
3113 Points (31%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7891 Points (9%)
9860 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
0 Points (0%)
4235 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
0 Points (0%)
5223 Points (47%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
0 Points (0%)
17014 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
0 Points (0%)
7277 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
0 Points (0%)
9969 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2472     avg: 2950     median: 2646 (3%)     max: 3731 ms
2254 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 15947     avg: 16825     median: 16604 (15%)     max: 17925 Points
19727 Points (18%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 71     avg: 83.7     median: 83 (17%)     max: 97 Points
115 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 55189     avg: 62040     median: 58957 (49%)     max: 71973 Points
68406 Points (57%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 45079     avg: 53673     median: 47554 (38%)     max: 68387 Points
52226 Points (42%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 56693     avg: 68299     median: 64645 (12%)     max: 83558 Points
117476 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 92494     avg: 97432     median: 94457 (34%)     max: 105346 Points
131099 Points (47%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 259370     avg: 291444     median: 295579 (28%)     max: 319383 Points
369207 Points (36%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
217082 Points (29%)
238069 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
4294 Points (23%)
8006 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
22692 Points (48%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 7541     avg: 8133     median: 7695 (50%)     max: 9164 Points
9527 Points (62%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 9189     avg: 10361     median: 9824 (49%)     max: 12070 Points
13099 Points (66%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 810 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 820 → 130% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 20:25:30

#0 checking url part for id 12116 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12581 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.079s ... 0.08s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.08s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12116 +0.015s ... 0.094s

#7 got single benchmarks 12116 +0.012s ... 0.106s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12581 +0.01s ... 0.117s

#9 got single benchmarks 12581 +0.01s ... 0.127s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.127s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.057s ... 0.184s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.186s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.188s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.19s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.192s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.194s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.196s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.2s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.205s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.21s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.214s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.044s ... 0.258s

#23 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.267s

#24 return log +0.024s ... 0.29s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)