, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs HiSilicon Kirin 620

HiSilicon Kirin 650

► remove from comparison Kirin 650

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2 GHz (performance cores). Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC.

The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster.

The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

 

HiSilicon Kirin 620

► remove from comparison Kirin 620

The HiSilicon Kirin 620 is an ARM-based octa core SoC for mid-range smartphones. It was announced at the end of 2014 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores at 1.2 GHz (max.). Furthermore, the processor integrates a ARM Mali-450 MP4 graphics card, an LPDDR3 memory controller, an LTE Cat.4 modem, 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth 4.0. The chip is manufactured in 28nm and relatively power efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 650HiSilicon Kirin 620
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
2000 MHz1200 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
16 28
ARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory ControllerARMv8-ISA, Mali-450 MP4, LTE (Cat. 4), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)ARM Mali-450 MP4
ArchitectureARMARM

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 6531     avg: 6885     median: 6884.5 (4%)     max: 7238 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11640 Points (12%)
min: 6434     avg: 6917     median: 6916.5 (7%)     max: 7399 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13588     avg: 13632     median: 13632 (14%)     max: 13676 Points
min: 6861     avg: 7534     median: 7533.5 (8%)     max: 8206 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1440 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3768     avg: 3841     median: 3841 (6%)     max: 3914
min: 2151     avg: 2453     median: 2452.5 (4%)     max: 2754
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 883     avg: 895     median: 894.5 (18%)     max: 906
min: 541     avg: 565     median: 564.5 (11%)     max: 588
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
166 MFLOPS (6%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
52 MFLOPS (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9111.2     avg: 9254     median: 9253.9 (16%)     max: 9396.5 ms
min: 15866     avg: 17376     median: 17375.6 (29%)     max: 18885.1 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1373.1     avg: 1679     median: 1679.4 (18%)     max: 1985.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4188     avg: 4472     median: 4472 (6%)     max: 4756 Points
min: 1857     avg: 2170     median: 2170 (3%)     max: 2483 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
1434 Points (38%)
907 Points (24%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1965 Points (44%)
1104 Points (25%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
3356 Points (44%)
1146 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 30558     avg: 32403     median: 32402.5 (33%)     max: 34247 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 50366     avg: 51755     median: 51754.5 (18%)     max: 53143 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
142543 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5120     avg: 5230     median: 5229.5 (26%)     max: 5339 Points
3717 Points (19%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 650 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 620 → 60% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 27. 22:34:17

#0 checking url part for id 8075 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6667 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:08:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8075 +0s ... 0.048s

#7 got single benchmarks 8075 +0.008s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6667 +0s ... 0.056s

#9 got single benchmarks 6667 +0.007s ... 0.063s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.071s

#12 return log +0.026s ... 0.097s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)