Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA

HiSilicon Kirin 620

► remove from comparison  Kirin 620

The HiSilicon Kirin 620 is an ARM-based octa core SoC for mid-range smartphones. It was announced at the end of 2014 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores at 1.2 GHz (max.). Furthermore, the processor integrates a ARM Mali-450 MP4 graphics card, an LPDDR3 memory controller, an LTE Cat.4 modem, 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth 4.0. The chip is manufactured in 28nm and relatively power efficient.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 801 MSM8974AA

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA is an ARM-based SoC for tablets and smartphonesIt is built at TSMC in a 28nm HPM (High Performance Mobile) HKMG process, whereas the Snapdragon 600 was manufactured in 28nm LP. In addition to 4 CPU cores with a clock speed of up to 2.26 GHz, the chip also integrates an Adreno 330 GPU up to 450 MHz, an LPDDR3-1600 memory controller and various radio modules (UMTS/LTE, WiFi, Bluetooth, GPS). Compared to other S801 SoCs (e.g the MSM8974AB), the MSM8974AA offers the lowest CPU-, GPU- and memory clock rates.

Processor 

The CPU portion is based on Qualcomm's Krait architecture, which is compatible with the ARMv7 ISA. Compared to the Snapdragon 600 (Krait 300), the new Krait 400 cores of the Snapdragon 800/801 have been tweaked just slightly with faster L2 cache. Thanks to a clock rate of up to 2.26 GHz and a high performance per MHz somewhere between an ARM Cortex-A9 and a Cortex-A15, the Snapdragon 801 offers very strong CPU performance. The S801 competes with the Nvidia Tegra 4, Samsung Exynos 5420 and Apple A7 and is therefore one of the fastest ARM SoCs on the market as of 2013.

Graphics

Another difference between the Snapdragon 600 and 800/801 is the graphics unit. While the S600 implements an Adreno 320 (400 to 450 MHz), the S800 /S801 feature the faster Adreno 330 (MSM8974Aa: 450 MHz). Both GPUs offer the same amount of texture units (8 TMUs), but the Adreno 330 has 50 percent more shaders (probably 6x SIMD16 vs. 4x SIMD16 of the previous generation)In conjunction with the higher memory bandwidth, the performance is significantly better. As a result, the Adreno 330 is slightly faster than the Mali-T628 (Exynos 5420) and the PowerVR G6430 (Apple A7). Depending on the device and cooling, however, the performance may vary. The GPU supports OpenGL ES 3.0 as well as OpenCL 1.2.

Features 

Furthermore, the MSM8974AA supports many wireless technologies: Bluetooth 4.0, WLAN, IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac (2.4/5 GHz), GSM (GPRS, EDGE), W-CDMA/UMTS (HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA+, cat.29 DC-HSPA+), MBMS, cat.4 LTE, CDMA2000 (1X RTT, 1 × EV-DO Rel.0/Rev.A/Rev.B, 1× EV-DO Rev.A MC, 1× Adv Rev.A/Rev.B) and TD-SCDMA. 

The MSM8974AA can encode and play UHD 4K videos in 3840x2160 at 30 FPS (120 Mbps H.264 High Profile) simultaneously via dedicated hardware. Moreover, it supports both USB 2.0 and 3.0 and cameras up to 55 megapixels and stereoscopic 3D.

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 28nm HPM HKMG process, the energy efficiency has been improved significantly compared to its LP 28nm S600 predecessor. Depending on the field of application, the maximum power consumption should be about 3 W for smartphones or 4 W or greater for tablets. This should be similar to comparable ARM SoCs currently in the market. However, the MSM8974AA will likely to need a little less power than the other S801 SoCs due to the lower clock rates.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 620Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA
Series Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A53Krait 400
Series: Snapdragon Krait 400
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 « 1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC compare2.45 GHz4 / 4 cores Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 APQ8074AB compare2.36 GHz4 / 4 cores Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB compare2.36 GHz4 / 4 cores Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA « 2.26 GHz4 / 4 cores Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 compare2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Krait 400
Clock1200 MHz2260 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesARMv8-ISA, Mali-450 MP4, LTE (Cat. 4), LPDDR3 Memory ControllerAdreno 330 (450 MHz), LTE cat.4, UMTS, MBMS, GSM, CDMA2000, tD-SCDMA, 802.11a/b/g/n/ac (2.4/5 GHz), Bluetooth 4.0, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR3-1600 Memory Controller (14.9 GB/s)
iGPUARM Mali-450 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 330 (? - 450 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
L1 Cache0 MB
L2 Cache2 MB
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 6531     avg: 6885     median: 6884.5 (6%)     max: 7238 Points
4282 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 6434     avg: 6917     median: 6916.5 (6%)     max: 7399 Points
4422 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 6861     avg: 7534     median: 7533.5 (6%)     max: 8206 Points
min: 4301     avg: 10729     median: 10728.5 (9%)     max: 17156 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
798 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1307 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2151     avg: 2453     median: 2452.5 (4%)     max: 2754 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 541     avg: 565     median: 564.5 (8%)     max: 588 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2570 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
913 Points (18%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
166 MFLOPS (6%)
634 MFLOPS (21%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
52 MFLOPS (5%)
425.5 MFLOPS (42%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 15866     avg: 17376     median: 17375.5 (20%)     max: 18885 ms
min: 7264     avg: 7519     median: 7518.5 (9%)     max: 7773 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1373     avg: 1680     median: 1679.5 (18%)     max: 1986 ms
1509 ms (17%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1857     avg: 2170     median: 2170 (2%)     max: 2483 Points
min: 4249     avg: 4530     median: 4529.5 (4%)     max: 4810 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
907 Points (24%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1104 Points (25%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1146 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 30558     avg: 32403     median: 32402.5 (33%)     max: 34247 Points
40256 Points (41%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 37549     avg: 45006     median: 45006 (15%)     max: 52463 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
3717 Points (19%)
min: 3036     avg: 3743     median: 3743 (19%)     max: 4450 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 620 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA → 212% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 19:40:45

#0 checking url part for id 6667 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6607 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.058s ... 0.059s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.059s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6667 +0.003s ... 0.062s

#7 got single benchmarks 6667 +0.01s ... 0.072s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6607 +0.003s ... 0.075s

#9 got single benchmarks 6607 +0.007s ... 0.083s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.083s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.103s ... 0.186s

#12 return log +0.072s ... 0.258s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)