Infinix XPad
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 2 scores (from 6 reviews)
Reviews for the Infinix XPad
Source: 91mobiles
The Infinix XPAD starts at Rs 11,999 for the 4GB+128GB variant and Rs 14,999 for the 8GB+256GB model, making it a compelling option in the budget tablet segment. For its price, it packs a strong multimedia experience with an 11-inch display, quad speakers, smooth day-to-day performance, and a lightweight design. Its biggest competition comes from the Redmi Pad SE (review), which offers a similar display and better battery life but lacks 4G connectivity, and the Realme Pad 2 (review), which boasts a higher refresh rate display. The Infinix XPAD strikes a great balance between features and price, delivering a solid all-round experience. It checks a lot of the right boxes and is definitely worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets
Honor's Pad X8a (Rs. 9,999) is the only worthy competitor to Infinix's XPad, as the company also offers an optional (or combo) cover that doubles up as a stand. However, it falls short when it comes to hardware as it is only available with 4GB RAM and 128GB of storage and also lacks cellular connectivity. Honor also does not provide a charger in the box. The Redmi Pad 4G (Rs. 10,999) is also a decent competitor, offers specifications similar (except for a smaller 8.7-inch display) to the Honor tablet, and comes with an optional cover accessory. As it stands, the Infinix XPad is the only tablet that does what it does in this budget segment, and there's really no touching it, whether it's hardware, software or battery life (despite its missing features and performance hiccups). And so, the XPad, despite its flaws, is still easy to recommend as it offers extremely good value for money.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/04/2024
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Manila Shaker
For their first attempt at a tablet, Infinix has managed to deliver a competitive and affordable device. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly tablet, the Infinix XPAD offers good battery life, a decent display, and reliable performance, all for under PHP 10,000. That’s our review of the Infinix XPAD. What do you think of this device? Let us know in the comments below! Additionally, for a more detailed exploration of Infinix XPAD performance, don’t forget to check out our video review on our YouTube Channel.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/13/2024
Foreign Reviews
Source: Yamobi
RU→ENPositive: Elegant design; great built quality; big screen; bright display; affordable price; stereo speakers; long battery life. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/11/2024
Source: Jagat Review
ID→ENPositive: Attractive price; decent performance; big screen; good speakers; large battery capacity; 8GB RAM; 256GB ROM. Negative: Poor display; mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/29/2024
Comment
ARM Mali-G57 MP2: Integrated mid range graphics card with 2 clusters. Based on the Valhall architecture.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Helio G99: ARM based octa-core SoC with 2x big ARM Cortex-A76 cores and 6x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores. All clocked up to 2.2 GHz. Integrates a Cat-13 LTE Modem (4G) and a ARM Mali-G57 MP2 graphics card. Compared to the older Helio G96, the G99 is manufactured in the more recent 6nm process and clocks higher.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
11.00":
This is a standard display format for tablet computers or small convertibles. You see more on the screen than on a smartphone but you can't use big resolutions well. On the other hand, mobility is not a problem.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.75%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.
