Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T vs Samsung Exynos 7904

Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T

The Mediatek Helio X25 MT6797T is an upper mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in 2016. It is manufactured in a 20 nm process and is equipped with 10 CPU cores. Two fast Cortex-A72 cores are running at up to 2.5 GHz, four Cortex-A53 cores at up to 2 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.55 GHz. All cores support 64-bit and the utilization of three clusters is supposed to improve efficiency according to Mediatek. The two A72 cores are only designed for short "Burst-Performance scenarios" according to Mediatek and are probably not used for sustained workloads. Compared to the similar Helio X20, the X25 offers faster clocked CPU and GPU cores.

The integrated ARM Mali T880 MP4 GPU is clocked at up to 850 MHz and has four cluster (from 16) from the Midgard (4th Gen) architecture.

The chip also includes an LTE modem (Cat. 6 300/50 Mbps, DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, CDMA2000, ...) as well as a WLAN 802.11ac (280 Mbps) modem. GPS/Glonass/BeiDou is supported for location. The integrated video encoder can handle up to 4Kx2K H.265 at 30 fps and HDR. The SoC can also decode H.265, H.264 and VP9 in 4K30. 

Power Consumption

The processor is manufactured in a 20 nm process at TSMC and should have an average power consumption under load.

Samsung Exynos 7904

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 7904

The Samsung Exynos 7904 (also called Exynos 7 Series) is a upper mid-range system-on-a-chip (SoC) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched early 2019 and features two Cortex-A73 cores clocked at up to 1.8 GHz. Furthermore, there are six power efficient Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.6 GHz, an ARM Mali-G71 MP2 GPU and a LPDDR4x memory controller. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE Cat.12 3CA 600 Mbps download speeds and Cat.13 2CA 150 Mbps upload. 802.11ac WiFi, Bluetooth 5.0 and FM Radio are also in the chip. Compared to the older and faster Exynos 7885, the 7904 offers a slower clocked A73 cores (1.8 versus 2.2 GHz).

It is manufactured in 14nm FinFET at Samsung and therefore a rather power efficient SoC.

ModelMediatek Helio X25 MTK6797TSamsung Exynos 7904
SeriesMediatek Mediatek Helio 20Samsung Exynos
CodenameCortex-A72 / A53Cortex-A73/-A53
Series: Exynos Cortex-A73/-A53
Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T « 2.5 GHz10 / 10 cores Cortex-A72 / A53
Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797 compare2.3 GHz10 / 10 cores Cortex-A72 / A53
Samsung Exynos 7885 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7904 « 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7884B compare1.56 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Clock2500 MHz1800 MHz
Cores / Threads10 / 108 / 8
Technology20 nm14 nm
FeaturesUMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 6, TD-SCDMA, 802.11ac WiFi, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, eMMC 5.1, 4K@30 H.265 Video Encoder, H.265 4K@30 Decode, ARM Mali 780 MHzARM Mali-G71 MP2, 2x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A53 (1.6 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T880 MP4 ( - 850 MHz)ARM Mali-G71 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 7904
0.2 pt (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
12500 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
10490 Points (9%)
min: 12321     avg: 12706     median: 12747 (11%)     max: 13009 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1523 Points (18%)
min: 1657     avg: 1708     median: 1710 (20%)     max: 1755 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1372 Points (16%)
min: 1677     avg: 1712     median: 1713 (20%)     max: 1745 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
239 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
596 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
273 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1010 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1791 Points (18%)
min: 1268     avg: 1306     median: 1320 (13%)     max: 1329 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4554 Points (5%)
min: 4017     avg: 4073     median: 4096 (4%)     max: 4105 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1247 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3702 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3799 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1263 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
598 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1860 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
7368 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3613 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4275 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
6470 ms (8%)
min: 3703     avg: 4610     median: 4515.5 (5%)     max: 5707 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
6089 Points (5%)
min: 7798     avg: 8407     median: 8372 (8%)     max: 9087 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 43     avg: 50.8     median: 52 (11%)     max: 56 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
43413 Points (15%)
min: 71303     avg: 73318     median: 73318 (25%)     max: 75333 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
6782 Points (21%)
min: 2712     avg: 5838     median: 6029.5 (19%)     max: 8580 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
24236 Points (30%)
min: 27074     avg: 30317     median: 31150.5 (38%)     max: 31891 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
23529 Points (7%)
min: 21269     avg: 22734     median: 23138.5 (7%)     max: 23389 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
41218 Points (25%)
min: 45380     avg: 46822     median: 46737 (29%)     max: 48432 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
95765 Points (17%)
min: 101367     avg: 105710     median: 105782 (19%)     max: 109906 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
23506 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
27124 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
6105 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
49105 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105840 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 131628     avg: 133094     median: 133094 (18%)     max: 134560 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
5563 Points (28%)
min: 5802     avg: 6452     median: 6542 (33%)     max: 6923 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
4.5 MB/s (3%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
72.8 MB/s (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
13.9 MB/s (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
259.3 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
4843 Points (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
5089 Points (24%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2527     avg: 2548     median: 2547.5 (13%)     max: 2568 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 4371     avg: 5078     median: 5077.5 (11%)     max: 5784 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5269     avg: 5372     median: 5372.5 (35%)     max: 5474 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7904 → 113% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 19:36:34

#0 checking url part for id 10556 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11376 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:33:54 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10556 +0.002s ... 0.023s

#7 got single benchmarks 10556 +0.006s ... 0.03s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11376 +0.013s ... 0.043s

#9 got single benchmarks 11376 +0.015s ... 0.057s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.127s ... 0.184s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.208s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)