ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:6200

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 vs vs Vivante GC800
Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 vs vs Vivante GC800

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200

The NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 / 6250 / 6200 TE is the smallest version of the series 6 with own memory. It offers few own memory and fills the rest with main memory (called TurboCache). The video performance is sufficient only for not demanding or elder games, though many features are supported.

The heat development and the current consumption are low (but higher than with integrated graphics). For gamers too weak and for a office notebook too hungry for energy? In reality GeForce Go 6200 is somewhere between it.

The GeForce Go 6250 is a somewhat higher clocked version of the 6200.

The PureVideo functions enable the 6200 to accelerate the playback of MPEG videos (not in HD). > Comparison Table

Vivante GC800

► remove from comparison

The Vivante GC800 is an integrated graphics card for ARM based (e.g. Rockchip RK291x) and MIPS based (e.g. Actions ATM701x) SoCs. It offers a single VEC-4 (or in other words four VEC-1) unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 2.0 (optional ES 3.0), OpenGL 2.0, OpenVG 1.1, DirectX 9_3 (optional) and OpenCL 1.2 (optional). The clock rate can be choosen between 315 and 575 MHz in 40nm designs and up to 800 MHz in 28nm designs.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200Vivante GC800
Series
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 6800 12/5 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 / 256 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6600 8/4 cores @ 0.38 GHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6400 4/3 cores @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6250 4/3 cores @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6200 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6150 2/1 cores @ 0.43 GHz
GeForce Go 6100 2/1 cores @ 0.43 GHz
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
CodenameNV44MV
Pipelines4 / 3 Pixel- / Vertexshader1 - unified
Core Speed300 MHz315 - 575 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed300 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR
Max. Amount of Memory32 MB
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0OpenGL ES 2.0
Power Consumption10 Watt
Transistors146 Million
technology110 nm28 nm
FeaturesUltraShadow II, Intellisample 3.0, PowerMizer 5.0, OpenGL 2
Date of Announcement01.02.2006 01.01.2012
Information110nm, 146 Millionen Transistoren, PCI-E
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.dewww.vivantecorp.com
CPU in GC800GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Rockchip RK29181 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
9000 Points (9%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
2500 Points (1%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
900 Points (1%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
100%
1 GC800 +
1899 Points (66%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
100%
1 GC800 +
3546 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
100%
1 GC800 +
4199 Points (44%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
100%
1 GC800 +
29.1 fps (48%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
100%
1 GC800 +
59.8 fps (89%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
100%
1 GC800 +
min: 1254     avg: 1911     median: 1259 (27%)     max: 3219 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC800 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 04. 22:04:25

#0 checking url part for id 42 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6200 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3156 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:42:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.202s ... 0.203s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.203s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.203s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 42 +0.055s ... 0.259s

#9 got single benchmarks 42 +0.017s ... 0.276s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 6200 +0.002s ... 0.278s

#11 got single benchmarks 6200 +0s ... 0.278s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3156 +0.002s ... 0.281s

#13 got single benchmarks 3156 +0.011s ... 0.292s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.292s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.309s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.309s

#17 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.312s

#18 return log +0.002s ... 0.314s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)