ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:9200

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected)

ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:2375

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs vs
Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs vs

NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

The Nvidia GeForce 9200M GS is a slower clocked 9300M GS chip and therefore also DirectX 10 capable.

Compared to the old 8400M series or the 9300M G, the 9200M GS features only 8 unified shaders and is produced in 65nm. Furthermore, it integrates the new VP3 video processor (8400M, 9300M G had VP2) with more video features and better hd-video decoding support.

In conjunction with the Nvidia 9100M G integrated graphics, the 9200M GS supports Hybrid-SLI (HybridPower and GeForceBoost). HybridPower is a technique to choose between the integrated and dedicated graphics core, if performance or battery runtime is needed. This works only in Windows Vista. Up to now the user has to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later Nvidia wants to switch automatically in the drivers. GeForceBoost uses the integrated graphics core of the 9100M G and the dedicated of the 9200M in SLI mode to achieve better frame rates.

As the 8400M G, the 9200M GS features 8 stream processors that do the work of the former dedicated pixel- and vertex-shaders. The unified shaders of Nvidia are 1-dimensional (AMD has 5-dimensional shaders which leads to the higher number of shaders).

Compared to the old 8400M G, the 9200M GS has a higher core speed and is therefore faster. Modern DirectX 10 games will run only in low details and resolutions. Older DirectX 9 games, like HalfLife 2 or Far Cry run fluently in medium to high details.

Compared to desktop graphics cards, the upcoming 9300 GE / GS should be similar, as it will also stem from the G98 core. Still the desktop counterparts are usually higher clocked and therefore faster.

NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
CodenameNB9M-GE
Pipelines8 - unified
Core Speed550 MHz
Shader Speed1300 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR2, GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption13 Watt
technology65 nm
Date of Announcement03.06.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
Series

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
100%
1  +
1415 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
100%
1  +
1257 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
100%
1  +
260552 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1  +
18705 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1  +
27236 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
100%
1  +
4075 Points (7%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 326     avg: 372.5     median: 372.5 (0%)     max: 419 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 249     avg: 286     median: 286 (0%)     max: 323 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 12603     avg: 13979     median: 14224 (15%)     max: 14700 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 5178     avg: 5832     median: 5960 (3%)     max: 6070 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 3139     avg: 3495     median: 3559 (4%)     max: 3600 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
3DMark 06
min: 1300     avg: 1633     median: 1500 (2%)     max: 2100 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
3DMark 06
min: 1810     avg: 1818     median: 1817.5 (2%)     max: 1825 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
3DMark 06
min: 2068     avg: 2083     median: 2083 (3%)     max: 2098 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
3DMark 06
1883 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2040     avg: 2296     median: 2335 (2%)     max: 2512 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
100%
1  +
1254 Points (27%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
5.2 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
:
56  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 9200M GS:
277 309 314 ~ 300 fps
med. 800x600
100%
GeForce 9200M GS:
56 63 64 ~ 61 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9200M GS:
17 22 23 ~ 21 fps
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9200M GS:
120  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9200M GS:
185 192.2 192.6 195.7 ~ 191 fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 256
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps







1










NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GSlowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R.3006121
Counter-Strike Source120
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo191
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



1


1
1


2









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 04. 03:54:46

#0 checking url part for id 753 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9200 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2375 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:36:19 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.175s ... 0.176s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.176s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.176s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 753 +0.054s ... 0.23s

#9 got single benchmarks 753 +0.031s ... 0.261s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9200 +0.002s ... 0.263s

#11 got single benchmarks 9200 +0.001s ... 0.264s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2375 +0.002s ... 0.266s

#13 got single benchmarks 2375 +0.33s ... 0.596s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.596s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.293s ... 0.889s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.889s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.889s

#18 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.904s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.904s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.905s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.01s ... 0.915s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.915s

#23 return log +0.002s ... 0.917s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)