Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Si 1520
Average of 9 scores (from 13 reviews)
Reviews for the Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Si 1520
The Amilo is neatly designed in silver, with a black trim around the edges. The edges of the unit are tapered, giving it a streamlined appearance and making it easy to slip into a bag.
minimal ausgestatteter Kurz-Test; online abrufbar
(von 5): 3, Preis/Leistung 4, Ausstattung 3, Ergonomie 3, Leistung gut
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/06/2007
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 80% performance: 80% features: 60% ergonomy: 60%
Source: IT Reviews
The latest addition to the Fujitsu Siemens Amilo range of notebooks is the small, elegant Si1520 which, despite its small, thin and light design, packs quite a punch due to the dual core processor at its heart. Stylishly finished in silver and black, the Amilo Si1520 weighs just 2.25kg including the small power adapter, and its small size (299 x 220 x 23.9mm) means it can be carried around without effort. This is a stylish, highly portable notebook with a good performance and some decent connectivity options, but it would be nice to see a bit more life from the battery.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
Leistung gut, Mobilität sehr gut, Akkulaufzeit mäßig
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/07/2006
Rating: performance: 85% mobility: 95%
The Amilo series is Fujitsu Siemens' line of 'value' home computers. While it might not be a powerful beast, the Amilo Si 1520 can certainly cope with most programs that are thrown at it, particularly given its slim looks and light weight. The core of the computer is an Intel Core Duo T2300 processor which runs at 1.66GHz, with an on-the-small-side 512Mb of memory. That's roughly in the middle of the Core Duo range, and while it means that the computer won't be able to deal with recent games at high levels of details, it's quite happy with office applications and web browsing. It's not suitable for anyone who wants an all-round entertainment and office PC, but for people who need to work or browse the internet on the move, the Amilo Si 1520 is a very good buy.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
4 von 5, Leistung schlecht, Mobilität gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/28/2006
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 45% mobility: 85%
Source: Tschauder.de DE→EN
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/15/2007
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 80% display: 50% workmanship: 60% ergonomy: 60%
Source: TV Movie Multimedia DE→EN
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/20/2007
Rating: Total score: 94% price: 80% performance: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/04/2006
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 100% performance: 88% features: 97% display: 89% mobility: 74% ergonomy: 73%
Source: Stiftung Warentest DE→EN
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/15/2006
Rating: performance: 84% display: 80% ergonomy: 88%
Source: Ciao.de DE→EN
User Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/04/2006
Rating: Total score: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 60%
Source: c't DE→EN
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/01/2006
Rating: price: 80% performance: 85% features: 85% display: 75% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Idealo DE→EN
User Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/17/2006
Rating: Total score: 100% display: 80%
Source: Dooyoo DE→EN
User Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/21/2006
Rating: Total score: 100% price: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: SFT DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/15/2006
Rating: Total score: 91% features: 80% display: 90%
Source: Notebookjournal DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/24/2006
Rating: performance: 96% features: 88% display: 76% mobility: 68%
CommentIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on Mobile Intel 945GM chipset. It is a faster clocked version of the GMA 900 and supports no hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) accelleration (which is required for some games).
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
Intel Core Duo: Double Core processor with a very good relation of performance to current consumption. The 2 MB L2 Cache are used together by the double. The maximum capacity of 31 watts is only 4 watts more than with the Pentium M (predecessor). Both cores are lowered automatically and independently of each other by speed steps down to 1 GHz. In addition it now supports also SSE3 instructions. At least it is just as fast as a equivalent Pentium M. With applications, which were designed for multi-processors, the performance can be nearly twice as fast as with the Pentium M (e.g. CineBench around 86% fast)
T2300: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This screen diagoal is quite large for tablets but small for subnotebooks. Some convertibles are also represented with that size.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
This weight is typical for very big tablets, subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 11-13 inch display-diagonal.
Fujitsu-Siemens: Fujitsu, founded 1935, is a Japanese company specializing in semiconductors, air conditioners, computers (supercomputers, personal computers, servers), telecommunications, and services, and is headquartered in Tokyo. Fujitsu employs around 160,000 people and has 500 subsidiary companies. The partnership with Siemens AG was established in 1999 in the form of Fujitsu Siemens Computers (FSC), one of Europe's largest IT hardware suppliers, and owned 50/50 by Fujitsu and Siemens. 2009, this cooperation was terminated, FSC ended to exist. In future, no laptops will be sold with the brand "Fujitsu-Siemens" but only "Fujitsu".
84.22%: This rating should be considered to be average. This is because the proportion of notebooks which have a higher rating is approximately equal to the proportion which have a lower rating.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.