Asus U5F
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 5 scores (from 9 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus U5F
Source: HardwareLuxx

Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/05/2007
Rating: ergonomy: 80%
Source: Facts

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/05/2007
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 90%
Source: Chip.de

Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/04/2006
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 85% performance: 86% features: 82% display: 89% mobility: 74% ergonomy: 82%
Source: Notebookjournal

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/31/2006
Rating: performance: 85% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75%
Source: Stiftung Warentest

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/15/2006
Rating: performance: 84% display: 86% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Connect

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/15/2006
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 69% features: 81% ergonomy: 92%
Source: Notebookcheck

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/15/2006
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 72% display: 86% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 85% emissions: 71%
Source: Business & IT

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/15/2006
Source: PC Praxis

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/15/2006
Rating: Total score: 91%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on Mobile Intel 945GM chipset. It is a faster clocked version of the GMA 900 and supports no hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) accelleration (which is required for some games).
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core Duo: Double Core processor with a very good relation of performance to current consumption. The 2 MB L2 Cache are used together by the double. The maximum capacity of 31 watts is only 4 watts more than with the Pentium M (predecessor). Both cores are lowered automatically and independently of each other by speed steps down to 1 GHz. In addition it now supports also SSE3 instructions. At least it is just as fast as a equivalent Pentium M. With applications, which were designed for multi-processors, the performance can be nearly twice as fast as with the Pentium M (e.g. CineBench around 86% fast)
T2300: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
12.10":
This range of display format is largely the upper limit for tablets and the lower limit for subnotebooks.
The advantage of subnotebooks is that the entire laptop can be small in size and therefore easily portable. The tiny display has the added advantage of requiring little power, which further improves battery life and thus mobility. The disadvantage is that reading texts is exhausting for the eyes. High resolutions, which one is used to from a standard laptop, are almost not usable.
The same applies to tablets in this size range.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Asus: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. is a major Taiwanese computer hardware manufacturer based in Taipei, founded in 1989. Under the Asus brand name, the company manufactures a wide range of products, including laptops, desktops, motherboards, graphics cards, monitors, smartphones and networking equipment, complete systems and PC components for end users.
Under the ROG (Republic of Gamers) brand name, ASUS manufactures gaming laptops known by gamers for their powerful specifications, dedicated graphics cards, high refresh rate displays and advanced cooling systems.
Beyond gaming, a wide range of notebooks are offered for different needs and budgets, from ultra-slim and lightweight ultrabooks to versatile 2-in-1 convertibles and budget-friendly options. In 2023, Asus had a 7% global market share of the PC market.
Customer satisfaction with ASUS notebooks concerns performance, the features, and the good price-performance ratio of ASUS notebooks. However, as with any brand, there are occasional reports of problems such as overheating, driver compatibility, or build quality issues.
83.4%: This rating is slightly above average, there are somewhat more devices with worse ratings. However, clear purchase recommendations look different.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.