Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G

MediaTek Dimensity 7050

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 7050

The Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (Mediatek MT8791N/TN)  is a mid-range ARM SoC (system-on-a-chip) that can be used in both smartphones and tablets (mainly Android). The SoC integrates two ARM Cortex-A78 cores with up to 2.6 GHz for demanding tasks and six power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores with clock rates of up to 2 GHz. The specifications are identical to the old Dimensity 1080.

The chip has an integrated sub-6 GHz 5G modem including dual-SIM support that can reach a maximum download speed of up to 2.77 Gbit/s. Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) is supported as well as Bluetooth 5.2.

The memory controller copes with LPDDR4x or LPDDR5 working memory as well as UFS 3.1 mass storage. As an integrated graphics card, the SoC uses the ARM Mali-G68 MC4, which supports displays with 120 Hz as well as HDR10+ at a maximum resolution of 2,520 x 1,440 pixels.

The MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is still manufactured in 6 nm.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 888 4G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G Mobile Platform is a high-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in mid 2021 and manufactured in 5 nm at Samsung. Compared to the earlier released Snapdragon 888 5G, the 4G variant only features a 4G LTE modem.

The chip integrates one “Prime Core” based on a ARM Cortex-X1 architecture clocked at up to 2.84 GHz. Three more performance cores are based on the A78 but clock up to 2.42 GHz. Furthermore, four energy saving cores are integrated that are based on the ARM Cortex-A55 architecture and clock at up to 1.8 GHz. In addition to the processor cores, the SoC integrates a WiFi 6e modem, a Hexagon 780 DSP (up to 26 TOPS of AI performance) and a Spectra 580 ISP. The integrated memory controller now supports faster LPDDR5 memory with up to 3,200 MHz. 

The performance of the processor cores should be around 15% better than the old Snapdragon 865+. The integrated Adreon 660 GPU should make a bigger jump by 35% (most likely compared to the SD 865).

ModelMediaTek Dimensity 7050Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
CodenameCortex-A78 / A55Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Clock2000 - 2600 MHz1800 - 2840 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
1 x 2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X1
3 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Technology6 nm5 nm
Features2x ARM Cortex-A78 (2.6 GHz), 6x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G68 MC4, 5G NR Sub-6 GHz, LTEAdreno 660 GPU, Spectra 580 ISP, Hexagon 780, X60 5G Modem, FastConnect 6900 WiFi,LPDDR5-6400 / LPDDR4X-4266 MHz Memory Controller (64 Bit)
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 660
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.com
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 compare1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G compare1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G compare1.8 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G « 1.8 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
L3 Cache3 MB
TDP5 Watt
Chip AI26 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4044     avg: 4205     median: 4279 (40%)     max: 4307 Points
min: 1751     avg: 3815     median: 4539 (43%)     max: 5156 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
4304 Points (49%)
min: 4222     avg: 4576     median: 4638 (53%)     max: 4867 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 2397     avg: 2454     median: 2422 (9%)     max: 2581 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 738     avg: 791     median: 795 (30%)     max: 835 Points
min: 1099     avg: 1105     median: 1107 (42%)     max: 1109 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1973     avg: 2163     median: 2171.5 (4%)     max: 2335 Points
min: 2944     avg: 3207     median: 3334 (6%)     max: 3342 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
762 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1960 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3616     avg: 3697     median: 3630 (36%)     max: 3844 Points
5083 Points (51%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8532     avg: 8932     median: 8637 (8%)     max: 9628 Points
13553 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3562 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8166 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
10869 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3811 Points (57%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1263.6     avg: 1474     median: 1488.7 (2%)     max: 1656.2 ms
min: 1835     avg: 1887     median: 1886.5 (2%)     max: 1938 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 31245     avg: 34210     median: 34656 (25%)     max: 37214 Points
min: 21748     avg: 23536     median: 22851 (17%)     max: 26010 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 66     avg: 87.8     median: 89 (24%)     max: 107 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 81     avg: 97.7     median: 99 (18%)     max: 113 Points
min: 101     avg: 108     median: 108 (19%)     max: 115 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 426859     avg: 466886     median: 442871 (22%)     max: 530929 Points
min: 784775     avg: 789386     median: 789386 (38%)     max: 793997 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 115632     avg: 126696     median: 122360 (30%)     max: 142097 Points
min: 205034     avg: 205504     median: 205504 (51%)     max: 205974 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 503958     avg: 554348     median: 554348 (18%)     max: 604738 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 170891     avg: 172047     median: 172046 (17%)     max: 173202 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 5092     avg: 5252     median: 5252 (1%)     max: 5412 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 58.7     avg: 60     median: 60 (41%)     max: 61.2 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 581     avg: 870     median: 869.5 (25%)     max: 1158 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 37.9     avg: 40.2     median: 40.2 (19%)     max: 42.4 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 623     avg: 1061     median: 1060.5 (26%)     max: 1498 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 27787     avg: 47399     median: 28605.5 (13%)     max: 104598 Points
35655 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 10909     avg: 12790     median: 12478 (45%)     max: 14561 Points
min: 11230     avg: 12134     median: 11897 (43%)     max: 13274 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 575     avg: 655     median: 669 (25%)     max: 706 Points
0 Points (0%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.31     avg: 5.1     median: 4.4 (2%)     max: 6.66 Watt
min: 5.09     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (2%)     max: 5.84 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.268     avg: 2.3     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 3.85 Watt
min: 1.357     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.426 Watt

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 7050 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G → 116% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 11. 07:08:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15080 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13837 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760159302s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15080 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 15080 +0.012s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13837 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 13837 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.018s ... 0.04s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.042s

#14 return log +0s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)