Crosscall Stellar Series

Crosscall Stellar-X5

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews

Crosscall Stellar-X5 Battery test
Source: DxOMark
The Crosscall Stellar-X5 showed an average overall battery performance with good autonomy, and decent efficiency, but a poor charging experience. When used moderately, the Stellar-X5 managed to last more than two and a half days, which is above average in our database. The Stellar-X5 performed well during our typical usage scenario, but it struggled during our tests when settings such as screen brightness were calibrated. The Stellar-X5’s charging experience was quite slow, with the 20W charger never delivering above 18W. Using a wired charger, the device took more than 3 hours to reach a full charge. A quick 5-minute battery top-up recovered on average a bit more than 2 hours and 30 minutes of autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/17/2024

Crosscall Stellar-X5 Camera test
Source: DxOMark
The Crosscall Stellar-X5 is the French brand’s entry into the Ultra-premium realm, with a sleeker look and feel as well as better camera specifications than prior models in an aim to bridge the gap between the rugged work phone and the personal phone. The higher-resolution sensor and a better chipset than the previously tested Action-X5 indeed resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of our image quality evaluation. The Stellar-X5’s camera score also improved considerably thanks to images that were consistently well exposed and that showed an extended dynamic range. In addition, the camera has an efficient zero shutter lag capability in most tested conditions, meaning the user is likely to capture the intended moment, particularly fast-action scenarios like sports.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/11/2024

Crosscall Stellar-X5 Display test
Source: DxOMark
The Crosscall Stellar-X5’s screen provided a very uneven performance in our Display protocol, with a screen experience that was affected by a pinkish cast in all conditions. Although the Stellar-X5’s display luminance and contrast levels were able to match most ultra-premium phones in indoor conditions, the device’s display was still difficult to read, especially in bright outdoor environments. In complete darkness, the screen’s luminance remained much too bright to offer a comfortable viewing experience. Watching HDR10 video was also a mixed experience. Although there were no frame drops, it was sometimes hard to make out the dark tones in the video content due to the lack of brightness.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2024

Crosscall Stellar-M6

Specifications

Price comparison

Average Score: 60% - poor

Reviews

Crosscall Stellar-M6 Camera results
Source: DxOMark
The Crosscall Stellar-M6’s single main camera delivered images with below-average quality for its High-end price segment. Even though the device is known for its solid build, the camera’s very limited performance in conditions other than ideal makes it unlikely to even appeal to users who need to take an occasional photo or video when out in the field. Target exposure and white balance were often on point, but only in bright conditions. Even in bright conditions, photos would sometimes be blurry because of a slow exposure time.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/04/2025

Foreign Reviews

60% Crosscall Stellar-M6
Source: Les Numeriques FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/14/2024
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 40% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%

Comment

Crosscall:

Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.

Qualcomm Adreno 710: Graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SoC. According to Qualcomm, 2x faster than the old Adreno 644 in the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

unknown:

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 6:

SD 6 Gen 1: Mid-range SoC with 8 Kryo cores (4x ARM Cortex A78 2.2 GHz performance cluster, 4x ARM Cortex A55 with 1.8 efficiency cluster) and an X62 5G modem (up to 2900 Mbps download). The chip is manufactured using the modern 4nm process.

:

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.

No weight comment found (one expected)!

60%: Such a poor rating is rare. There are only a few notebooks that were rated even worse. The rating websites do not give a purchase recommendation here.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Devices with the same GPU

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight