Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Athlon Silver 3050U vs AMD Athlon Gold 7220U

AMD Athlon Silver 3050U

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 3050U

The AMD Athlon Silver 3050U is a mobile processor for thin and light entry level laptops. It is based on the Picasso series (e.g. Ryzen 3000U APUs) and offers two Zen cores clocked at 2.3 to 3.2 GHz without SMT (two threads at once) and 4 MB of L3 Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 2 and offers only 2 CUs (128 shaders) clocked at up to 1,100 MHz.

In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Athlon Silver 3050C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the 3050U, as of August 2023. Expect the chip to be just a few percentage points slower than the Athlon 3150U (two Zen cores, 4 threads, up to 3.3 GHz). This kind of performance should suffice for most day-to-day tasks but not much more than that.

Power consumption

This Athlon series chip has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and peformance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Last but not the least, the APU is built with a 14 nm process leading to poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Athlon Gold 7220U

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 7220U

The AMD Athlon Gold 7220U is a mobile processor for cheap laptops of the Mendocino series. It integrates two older Zen 2 cores (similar to the Ryzen 4000 series). The CPU cores clock from 2.4 GHz (base) to 3.7 GHz (single core Turbo) and can use 4 MB L3 cache. Thanks to SMT/Hyperthreading, the CPU can work on 4 threads simultaneously. The integrated memory controller only supports fast LPDDR5 memory (5500 MHz max.). Compared to the faster Mendocino models like the Ryzen 5 7520U, the 7220U offers only two cores and reduced clock speeds, leading to a clearly lower CPU performance.

The integrated graphics card (Radeon 610M iGPU) uses the modern RDNA 2 architecture, but only 2 CUs (128 shaders) and clocks with up to 1.9 GHz.

The CPU performance should be better than the fastest Ryzen dual-core (Ryzen 3 3250U, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Zen 1) but clearly stay behind modern quad-core CPUs (in multi threaded tests).

The Mendocino series are produced in a relatively modern 6nm FinFET process at TSMC and should offer a good power efficiency. The Athlon Gold 7220U is rated at 8-15 W TDP and therefore well suited for thin and light laptops.

ModelAMD Athlon Silver 3050UAMD Athlon Gold 7220U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
CodenameDali (Zen)Mendocino (Zen 2)
Series: Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) Mendocino (Zen 2)
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U « 2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7520C compare2.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 7320C compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U « 2.4 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 7220C compare2.4 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 7120U compare2.4 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 7120C compare2.4 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2300 - 3200 MHz2400 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology14 nm6 nm
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketFP5
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 2 ( - 1100 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
743 Points (31%)
932 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1429 Points (3%)
2159 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon Silver 3050U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon Gold 7220U → 138% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 18. 11:46:24

#0 checking url part for id 11695 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14613 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.02s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11695 +0.003s ... 0.024s

#7 got single benchmarks 11695 +0.017s ... 0.041s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14613 +0.003s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 14613 +0.006s ... 0.05s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.064s

#12 return log +0.051s ... 0.114s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)