Asus X51R
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 6 scores (from 10 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus X51R
Source: IT Reviews
Archive.org versionWhile the display does suffer from a narrow viewing angle, you really can't moan too much about this well equipped laptop which is a bargain at the asking price.
Display mangelhaft, Ausstattung gut, Preis gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/10/2008
Rating: price: 80% features: 80% display: 50%
Foreign Reviews
Source: c't - 16/08

Comparison, , Long, Date: 08/15/2008
Rating: performance: 50% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 30% ergonomy: 70% emissions: 90%
Source: Computerbild - 8/08

Comparison, , Medium, Date: 03/15/2008
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% performance: 50% emissions: 80%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% features: 10% display: 50% mobility: 50% workmanship: 50% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/30/2007
Rating: Total score: 58% performance: 58% features: 68% display: 64% mobility: 38% ergonomy: 82% emissions: 80%
Source: c't - 25/07

Comparison, , Long, Date: 11/16/2007
Rating: performance: 40% display: 50% mobility: 40% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 80%
Source: Computerbild
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/05/2007
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 90% display: 50%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/01/2007
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 30% features: 50% display: 50% mobility: 30% workmanship: 60% ergonomy: 70% emissions: 80%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/29/2007
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 62% display: 88% mobility: 69% workmanship: 86% ergonomy: 85% emissions: 79%
Comment
ATI Radeon Xpress 1100: The successor of the Xpress M200 integrated shared memory graphic card is based on a x300 core. Aero Glass should run fluently on the card.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Celeron M: It is a Pentium M with halved level 2 Cache and limited on FSB 400. The characteristic of this processor is the speed, which is hardly slower than an equivalent Pentium M. However it can change the speed not dynamically like the Pentium M and therefore needs without load more current.
It is also available as Low Voltage Version with very small current consumption.
520: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Reviews and price comparison on Asus Laptops at Ciao




































