Notebookcheck Logo

Archos 50 Cesium

Specifications

Archos 50 Cesium
Archos 50 Cesium (Cesium Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 4 x 1.1 GHz, Cortex-A7
Graphics adapter
Memory
1024 MB 
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel, glossy: yes
Weight
150 g ( = 5.29 oz / 0.33 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

 

Pricecompare

Average Score: 87% - good
Average of 1 scores (from 2 reviews)
price: - %, performance: - %, features: 89%, display: - % mobility: - %, workmanship: 89%, ergonomy: 85%, emissions: - %

Reviews for the Archos 50 Cesium

Archos 50 Cesium
Source: c't - Heft 08/2016 German
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
87% Archos 50 Cesium im Test: Dual-SIM-Smartphone mit Windows 10 Mobile
Source: Teltarif German DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 87% features: 89% workmanship: 89% ergonomy: 85%

Comment

Qualcomm Adreno 304: Integrated mid-range graphics card in the Snapdragon 210 SoCs that supports OpenGL ES 3.0 and features unified shaders.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.


210 MSM8909: Entry-level SoC with four ARM Cortex-A7 cores at max. 1.1 GHz. Furthermore, it features an integrated Cat 4 LTE Modem and 1080p video de- and encoding.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.


5.00":

This display is tiny. You will probably see very little on the screen and be able to use mini-resolutions.

» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.


Archos: The French manufacturer Archos S.A. was founded in 1988. While they initially produced products such as MP3 players, they have started producing laptops, smartphones, and tablets in 2009.

 

The world market shares are small, but there are many reviews on Archos smartphones and tablets. While the ratings were below average in the early years, they have become better by 2016.


87%: This is an above-average rating. Nevertheless, it should not be forgotten that about one fifth of all tested models receive a better rating.


» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

 

Please share our article, every link counts!

Similar devices with the Same Specs

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Doro 8035
Adreno 304
LG K8 2018 (K9)
Adreno 304
Wileyfox Pro
Adreno 304
AGM X1 mini
Adreno 304
Alcatel A30
Adreno 304
LG Tribute HD
Adreno 304
LG K4 2017
Adreno 304
LG Phoenix 2
Adreno 304
Wiko Freddy
Adreno 304
Lenovo Vibe C
Adreno 304
Alcatel Pop 4
Adreno 304
HTC Desire 530
Adreno 304

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Nokia 2
Adreno 304, Snapdragon 200 212 APQ8009
Wiko Tommy 2
Adreno 304, Snapdragon 200 212 APQ8009
Wiko Tommy
Adreno 304, unknown
Microsoft Lumia 650
Adreno 304, Snapdragon 200 212 APQ8009

Devices with the same GPU

CAT B35
Adreno 304, Snapdragon QC 205, 2.40", 0.13 kg
Nokia 8110 4G
Adreno 304, Snapdragon QC 205, 2.45", 0.117 kg
TP-Link Neffos Y50
Adreno 304, Snapdragon 200 210 MSM8909, 4.50", 0.128 kg
Alcatel Pixi 4, 6-inch
Adreno 304, Snapdragon 200 210 MSM8909, 6.00", 0.187 kg
Alcatel OneTouch Pixi 4
Adreno 304, Snapdragon 200 210 MSM8909, 6.00", 0 kg
LG K3 2017
Adreno 304, Snapdragon 200 210 MSM8909, 4.50", 0.132 kg
Current Prices
Stefan Hinum, 2016-02-14 (Update: 2016-02-14)