Acer Aspire 5741G Series
Processor: Intel Core i3 330M, Intel Core i3 350M, Intel Core i5 430MGraphics Adapter: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470, NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
Display: 15.60 inch
Weight: 2.527kg, 2.6kg, 3kg
Price: 600, 700, 1000 euro
Average of 20 scores (from 25 reviews)
Acer Aspire 5741G-334G50Mn
Specifications
Notebook: Acer Aspire 5741G-334G50MnProcessor: Intel Core i3 330M
Graphics Adapter: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 512 MB
Display: 15.60 inch, 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixels
Weight: 2.527kg
Links: Acer homepage Acer notebook section
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
All-rounder at your fingertips. Is an aesthetic overhaul enough to keep Acer's Mainstream 15.6-incher within the public eye? With a matte finish, the glossy devil has been banished from the outer lid and the interior has a rather noble touch. The i3-330M and an ATI HD5470 take care of the performance side of things.
Source: Computer Active Archive.org version
An entertainment laptop that's excellent for gaming. The Acer Aspire 5741 is a powerful laptop for anyone interested in entertainment. It has one of the latest Intel Core i3 processors, 4GB of memory and a 15.4in screen, a specification well suited to most computing tasks, including playing high-definition video. It also runs games significantly better than most other portable computers we’ve seen. One of the best-value gaming laptops we’ve seen.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/18/2010
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Active Archive.org version
An entertainment laptop that's excellent for gaming. The Acer Aspire 5741 is a powerful laptop for anyone interested in entertainment. It has one of the latest Intel Core i3 processors, 4GB of memory and a 15.4in screen, a specification well suited to most computing tasks, including playing high-definition video. It also runs games significantly better than most other portable computers we’ve seen. One of the best-value gaming laptops we’ve seen.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/18/2010
Rating: Total score: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Go DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/21/2010
Rating: price: 80% features: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC Go DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/21/2010
Rating: price: 80% features: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC Welt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/02/2010
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 71% features: 73% display: 69% mobility: 60%
Source: T-Online DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/02/2010
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 71% features: 77% display: 69% mobility: 60%
Source: PC Welt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/02/2010
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 71% features: 73% display: 69% mobility: 60%
Source: T-Online DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/02/2010
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 71% features: 77% display: 69% mobility: 60%
Source: Computerbild - 14/10
Comparison, , Long, Date: 07/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 90% performance: 94% features: 84% display: 89% ergonomy: 84% emissions: 91%
Source: Computerbild - 14/10
Comparison, , Long, Date: 07/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 90% performance: 94% features: 84% display: 89% ergonomy: 84% emissions: 91%
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2010
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2010
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: PC Praxis - 6/10
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 92% price: 80%
Source: PC Praxis - 6/10
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 92% price: 80%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2010
Rating: performance: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2010
Rating: performance: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: Notebookjournal DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/09/2010
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% features: 50% display: 30% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Notebookjournal DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/09/2010
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% features: 50% display: 30% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Notebookcheck DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 83% display: 81% mobility: 77% workmanship: 86% ergonomy: 90% emissions: 89%
Source: Notebookcheck DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 83% display: 81% mobility: 77% workmanship: 86% ergonomy: 90% emissions: 89%
Acer Aspire 5741G-434G50MN
Specifications
Notebook: Acer Aspire 5741G-434G50MNProcessor: Intel Core i5 430M
Graphics Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
Display: 15.60 inch, 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixels
Weight: 2.6kg
Price: 700 euro
Links: Acer homepage Acer notebook section
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Notebookinfo DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2010
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% emissions: 80%
Acer Aspire 5741G-434G64BN
Specifications
Notebook: Acer Aspire 5741G-434G64BNProcessor: Intel Core i5 430M
Graphics Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
Display: 15.60 inch, 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixels
Weight: 2.6kg
Price: 1000 euro
Links: Acer homepage Acer notebook section
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Welt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2010
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% performance: 84% features: 82% display: 79% mobility: 70% ergonomy: 96%
Source: Datormagazin SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/20/2010
performance: 80%
Acer Aspire 5741G-6983
Specifications
Notebook: Acer Aspire 5741G-6983Processor: Intel Core i5 430M
Graphics Adapter: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Display: 15.60 inch, 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixels
Weight: 3kg
Price: 600 euro
Links: Acer homepage Acer notebook section
Price comparison
Reviews
Source: PC World Archive.org version
A great all-purpose unit with superior gaming potential.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/23/2010
Rating: performance: 81% features: 86%
Acer Aspire 5741G-354G32Mnsk
Specifications
Notebook: Acer Aspire 5741G-354G32MnskProcessor: Intel Core i3 350M
Graphics Adapter: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Display: 15.60 inch, 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixels
Weight: 2.6kg
Price: 700 euro
Links: Acer homepage Acer notebook section
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Aspire 5741G-354G32Mnsk is a good laptop and one we enjoyed using over a few weeks. The attractive design will definitely be a selling point for some, while usability is also good. However, performance is a little average, as is portability, and the hard drive storage is also bettered by its rivals.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/25/2011
Rating: Total score: 70%
Comment
Acer: In 1976, the company was founded in Taiwan under the name Multitech and was renamed Acer or Acer Group in 1987. The product range includes, for example, laptops, tablets, smartphones, desktops, monitors, TVs and computer peripherals. Since 2007, the group has merged with Gateway Inc. and Packard Bell, which also market their own laptop product lines.
Acer computers are designed for a variety of purposes, including ultrabooks for mobile use, gaming laptops for gamers, affordable options for everyday tasks, and 2-in-1 convertible laptops for versatility. Acer's product portfolio also includes tablets that offer portable computing and multimedia capabilities.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470: Entry level DirectX 11 chip with GDDR5 support but only 80 shader cores. Supports Eyefinity (up to 4 monitors) and 8-ch HD audio over HDMI. Performance on par with the old GeForce 8600M GT.
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M: The GT320M was presented in the HP dv6t and dv7t series and is based on a stripped down GT216 with only 24 shaders.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core i3:
330M:
The Core i3-330M is a slower clocked 350M and therefore also lacks the Turbo Boost feature and clocks with max. 2.13 GHz. Thanks to Hyperthreading, 4 threads can be processed simultaneously. An integrated graphics card (GMA HD 3150) and a DDR3 memory controller are also included in the package.
350M:
The Core i3-350M is technically a Core i5-430M without the Turbo Boost overlocking feature. Therefore, it always clocks with max. 2.26 GHz (of course Speedstep is included). Thanks to Hyperthreading, 4 threads can be processed simultaneously. An integrated graphics card (GMA HD) and a DDR3 memory controller are also included in the package.
Intel Core i5:
430M:
The Core i5-430M is a middle class dual core CPU that features only 3 MB L3 Cache (compared to the I7-640M) and clocks between 2.26-2.53 GHz (Turbo Mode). Furthermore, VT-d, trusted Execution and AES features are missing in the 430M. Thanks to Hyperthreading, 4 threads can be processed simultaneously. An integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics with 500-733 MHz) and a DDR3 memory controller are also included in the package.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
2.527 kg:
With this weight, a laptop is rather heavier than average. Devices in this range shine more with screen size and performance than with mobility.
3 kg:
82.25%: This rating is slightly above average, there are somewhat more devices with worse ratings. However, clear purchase recommendations look different.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.