Acer Aspire 1830TZ
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 2 scores (from 4 reviews)
Reviews for the Acer Aspire 1830TZ
Source: Gadgetmix

Acer recently launched its newly developed Acer Aspire 1830T netbook which packs some immense integrated technology inside. The 1830T comes with 11.6-inch display having 1366×768 pixel resolution and is powered by the Intel Core i5-430M/520M processor.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/02/2010
Rating: performance: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Laptop Mag

With the TimelineX 1830T, Acer continues its line of powerful and small ultraportables. This machine looks good and offers excellent performance and nearly 6 hours of endurance. However, $699 is nothing to sneeze at. Those on a budget will likely prefer the $599 Core i3 version of the TimelineX (1830T-3505). Or you may gravitate towards an even cheaper big-screen netbook like the $499 Asus Eee PC 1201PN, which has comparable graphics performance but less battery life and processing power. Still, the 1830T offers the best combination yet of portability and power in an 11.6-inch design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2010
Rating: Total score: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Cyberbloc

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/04/2010
Rating: price: 80%
Source: e-media - 10/10

Comparison, , Long, Date: 05/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% display: 80% mobility: 100%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics: Onboard graphics card that is built in the new Arrandale CPUs (Core i3 / i5 / i7 Dual Cores). Depending on the model and Turbo Boost, the GMA HD is clocked between 166 and 766 MHz.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
U5400: Entry level dual core CPU of the Arrandale series. Does not support Turbo Boost (for the CPU), Hyperthreading, Virtualization and AES. Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is only sufficient for non demanding applications.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.