Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A10 Pro-7350B vs AMD A6-6310

AMD A10 Pro-7350B

► remove from comparison AMD A10 Pro-7350B

The AMD A10 Pro-7350B is a power efficient ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) quad-core processor based on the Kaveri architecture. It was revealed in June 2014 for notebooks and is manufactured by GlobalFoundries using a 28 nm SHP process. In addition to having two CPU modules for a total of four integer cores clocked at 2.1 - 3.3 GHz, the AMD chip also integrates a Radeon R6 GPU clocked at up to 553 MHz with 384 GCN shaders and a dual-channel DDR3-1600 memory controller.

Technically, the 7350B is almost identical with the consumer model FX-7500. However, AMD guarantees an especially high stability and durability for the business-oriented Pro-Series.

Architecture 

Kaveri is the successor to the 2013 Richland architecture (e.g. A10-5750M). The revised CPU cores, codenamed Steamroller, represent the third generation of the module-based Bulldozer design. A number of major changes include modified decoders (now one per integer core), optimized branch prediction, and increased L1 I-cache from 64 KB to 96 KB per module. These revisions boost the performance per clock slightly over a similarly clocked Richland APU. For more details about the AMD Kaveri architecture, see our detailed analysis here:

Analysis of the AMD Kaveri Notebook Platform

Performance 

According to our benchmarks (shown below), the A10 Pro-7350B offers a CPU performance level similar to the Haswell-based Intel Core i3-4100U. Overall, the 7350B will be sufficient for all daily workloads (Office, Internet browsing, multimedia) as well as light multitasking.

Graphics

The Radeon R6 (Kaveri) GPU of the A10 Pro-7350B features a core clock of up to 553 MHz and 384 shader units. Since the GPU is based on AMD's GCN 1.1 architecture, both DirectX 11.2 "Tier 2" and Mantle are supported. Furthermore, the GPU can be used for general purpose computing in various applications, such as Adobe Photoshop via the OpenCL API. 

In terms of 3D performance, the GPU is almost as fast as a dedicated GeForce GT 720M and can handle many current games at low or medium settings at (W)XGA resolution.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 19 Watts, which is somewhat above the Haswell ULV CPUs from Intel (15 W including chipset). Nevertheless, the A10 Pro-7350B is suited for 12 - 13-inch notebooks or larger.

AMD A6-6310

► remove from comparison AMD A6-6310

The AMD A6-6310 is a mobile quad-core SoC (codenamed "Beema") for entry-level devices and subnotebooks, which has been presented in April 2014. In addition to 4 CPU cores clocked at 1.8 - 2.4 GHz (boost clock), the 28 nanometer chip also integrates a Radeon R4 GPU, a single-channel DDR3L-1866 memory controller and the Southbridge with various I/O-ports.

Architecture

Both Beema (for notebooks) and Mullins (for tablets and compact subnotebooks, same die) are based on AMD's Puma+ architecture, which is the successor to the previous Jaguar design (Kabini and Temash APUs). Neither the performance per clock nor the feature set (including SSE up to 4.2, AVX and AES) have been modified. However, AMD managed to reduce the leakage current, enabling significantly higher (boost) clock speeds. This leads to a more responsive system and better overall performance. As its predecessor, the chip is manufactured in 28 nm, however by Globalfoundires instead of TSMC.

Performance

Thanks to its higher boost clock, the A6-6310 slightly outperforms the former A6-5200 (25 W, 2.0 GHz) in single thread tasks. The multi thread performance is quite similar and on par with Intel's Core i3-4010U. Overall, the A6-6310 should be sufficient for all daily workloads like Office, Internet browsing and multimedia.

Graphics

The SoC integrates a Radeon R4 GPU with 128 shaders, which is based on the GCN architecture and clocked at up to 800 MHz. On average, the graphics performance is comparable to Intel's HD Graphics 4200 or a dedicated Radeon HD 7470M . Only a few current games (as of 2014) are thus playable in low settings, but older and less demanding titels will run flawlessly.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the entire SoC is rated at 15 watts. Thus, the APU is suitable for smaller subnotebooks.

ModelAMD A10 Pro-7350BAMD A6-6310
CodenameKaveriBeema
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD AMD A-Series
Series: AMD A-Series Beema
AMD FX-7600P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-7400P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-7200P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-7500 compare2.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10 Pro-7350B « 2.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-7300 compare1.9 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8 Pro-7150B compare1.9 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-7100 compare1.8 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6 Pro-7050B compare2.2 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-7000 compare2.2 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A8-6410 compare2 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-6310 « 1.8 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A4-6210 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock2100 - 3300 MHz1800 - 2400 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP19 Watt15 Watt
Transistors2410 Million930 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm
Die Size245 mm2107 mm2
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1866
iGPUAMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri) (? - 553 MHz)AMD Radeon R4 (Beema) (? - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
L1 Cache256 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 151     avg: 160     median: 162 (1%)     max: 167 Points
min: 146     avg: 157     median: 157 (1%)     max: 175 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 49     avg: 55.3     median: 55 (15%)     max: 62 Points
min: 46     avg: 47.2     median: 47 (13%)     max: 49 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.69     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (2%)     max: 1.91 Points
min: 1.62     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (3%)     max: 2.15 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.63     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.7 Points
min: 0.55     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.6 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1907     avg: 2004     median: 2003.5 (12%)     max: 2100 Points
min: 1709     avg: 1808     median: 1829 (11%)     max: 1858 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4951     avg: 5276     median: 5275.5 (4%)     max: 5600 Points
min: 5309     avg: 5662     median: 5612 (4%)     max: 6200 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 6750     avg: 7166     median: 7166 (5%)     max: 7582 Points
6743 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2573     avg: 2685     median: 2684.5 (3%)     max: 2796 Points
2271 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
914 s (11%)
836 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
23.3 s (5%)
26.6 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1456     avg: 1484     median: 1484 (2%)     max: 1512 Points
1247 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 11.18     avg: 12.1     median: 12.1 (0%)     max: 12.98 fps
11.1 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 65.4     avg: 68.1     median: 68.1 (2%)     max: 70.8 fps
52.2 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.132     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.158 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.202     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.244 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 1.1     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (3%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
1.2 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2506     avg: 2525     median: 2525 (5%)     max: 2544 Points
2730 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23.46     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (5%)     max: 25.42 s
28.9 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 63     avg: 64.6     median: 64.6 (3%)     max: 66.1 s
66.1 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1532     avg: 1574     median: 1574 (7%)     max: 1616 s
1481 s (7%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5498     avg: 5533     median: 5533 (4%)     max: 5568 Points
5704 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1812     avg: 1984     median: 2066 (5%)     max: 2075 Points
min: 1721     avg: 1830     median: 1825 (4%)     max: 1925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 16380     avg: 17970     median: 18395 (15%)     max: 19136 Points
min: 19842     avg: 22175     median: 22141.5 (18%)     max: 25867 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1395     avg: 1528     median: 1576 (4%)     max: 1613 Points
min: 1796     avg: 1917     median: 1887.5 (5%)     max: 2214 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1940     avg: 2129     median: 2193 (4%)     max: 2254 Points
min: 2468     avg: 2704     median: 2643.5 (5%)     max: 3149 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3733     avg: 3869     median: 3868.5 (7%)     max: 4004 Points
min: 3183     avg: 3515     median: 3549 (6%)     max: 4012 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1390     avg: 1449     median: 1449 (19%)     max: 1508 Points
min: 1175     avg: 1231     median: 1233 (16%)     max: 1289 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2728 Points (14%)
3184 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2660 Points (18%)
2667 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3786 Points (7%)
5290 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4812 Points (10%)
4057 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3814 Points (10%)
4123 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 A6-6310 +
min: 6279     avg: 6542     median: 6468 (8%)     max: 6880 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 A6-6310 +
min: 251.1     avg: 297     median: 254.9 (3%)     max: 415.5 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 A6-6310 +
min: 5334     avg: 5494     median: 5574 (4%)     max: 5575 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD A10 Pro-7350B → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-6310 → 99% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 08. 08:07:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5994 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5908 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759903663s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5994 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 5994 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5908 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 5908 +0.007s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.05s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.052s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)