Intel Pentium 967 vs Intel Pentium B960

Intel Pentium 967

► remove

The Intel Pentium 967 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, Virtualization (VT-x, VT-d), HyperThreading, AES or Trusted Execution are deactivated. The Pentium 967 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked from 350 - 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Pentium 967 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore faster than a 1.3 GHz Pentium U5600.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 967 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Pentium B960

► remove Intel B960

The Intel Pentium B960 is a dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost for the CPU part, HyperThreading, AES, Virtualization (VT-x and VT-d), Trusted Execution or Intel Quick Sync are deactivated. The Pentium B960 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 clocked at 650 / 1100 (with Turbo Boost).

The performance of the Pentium B960 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU. Therefore, the B960 should perform similar to the Core i3-330M with 2.13 GHz, HyperThreading and 3MB Cache.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and DDR3-1333 memory controller.

Intel Pentium 967Intel Pentium B960
Intel PentiumIntel Pentium
Sandy BridgeSandy Bridge
: Pentium Sandy Bridge
Intel Pentium B980 (compare)2400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B970 (compare)2300 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B9602200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B950 (compare)2100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B940 (compare)2000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 997 (compare)1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 987 (compare)1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 977 (compare)1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Pentium 9671300 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 957 (compare)1200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B980 (compare)2400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B970 (compare)2300 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Pentium B9602200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B950 (compare)2100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B940 (compare)2000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 997 (compare)1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 987 (compare)1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 977 (compare)1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 9671300 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 957 (compare)1200 MHz2 / 22 MB
1300 MHz2200 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
17 35
32 32
100 °C85 °C
BGA1023rPGA988B
HD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1100 MHz)
Intel Pentium 967Intel Pentium B960
624
149 mm2

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
967 +
1 Points (2%)
176%
B960 +
min: 1.45     avg: 1.6     median: 1.7 (4%)     max: 1.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
B960 +
0.9 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
967 +
1640 Points (17%)
174%
B960 +
min: 2759     avg: 2838     median: 2851 (29%)     max: 2869 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
967 +
3038 Points (5%)
181%
B960 +
min: 5019     avg: 5417     median: 5500 (9%)     max: 5550 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
100%
967 +
3816 Points (4%)
177%
B960 +
min: 6083     avg: 6648     median: 6757.5 (8%)     max: 6815 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
100%
967 +
2116 Points (20%)
166%
B960 +
min: 2563     avg: 3337     median: 3521 (33%)     max: 3542 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
100%
967 +
1872 seconds (22%)
112%
B960 +
min: 1024.73     avg: 1069     median: 1060.9 (13%)     max: 1128.68 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
100%
967 +
58.6 seconds (12%)
106%
B960 +
min: 32.183     avg: 33.7     median: 33.5 (7%)     max: 35.696 seconds
WinRAR - Result
100%
B960 +
min: 1354     avg: 1367     median: 1366.5 (14%)     max: 1379 KB/s
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
100%
B960 +
9.2 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
100%
B960 +
51.7 fps (18%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
100%
B960 +
min: 0.074     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (3%)     max: 0.0758 GB/s
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
100%
B960 +
min: 0.127     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.133 GB/s
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
100%
B960 +
min: 0.165     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (1%)     max: 0.172 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
967 +
1319 Points (9%)
169%
B960 +
min: 2133     avg: 2215     median: 2231 (15%)     max: 2248 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
967 +
30.4 Seconds (7%)
103%
B960 +
min: 17.971     avg: 18.3     median: 18 (4%)     max: 18.931 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
967 +
67.1 Seconds (3%)
101%
B960 +
min: 40.638     avg: 41.6     median: 41 (2%)     max: 43.776 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
967 +
1534 Seconds (7%)
103%
B960 +
min: 917     avg: 937     median: 937 (4%)     max: 958.222 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
967 +
16130 MIPS (8%)
169%
B960 +
min: 24750     avg: 28587     median: 27320 (13%)     max: 33690 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
967 +
9310 MFLOPS (7%)
171%
B960 +
min: 15880     avg: 15893     median: 15900 (12%)     max: 15900 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
100%
967 +
4.3 points (55%)
142%
B960 +
min: 6.1     avg: 6.4     median: 6.1 (78%)     max: 7.6 points
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
B960 +
min: 4552     avg: 5131     median: 5216.5 (7%)     max: 5409 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
100%
B960 +
2139 points (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium 967 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium B960 → 128%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.11
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)