Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626

Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa

► remove from comparison Samsung 7870 Octa

The Samsung Exynos 7 Octa is a 64-bit SoC for mainstream smartphones and tablets (usually Android based). It was announced in February 2016 and integrates eight Cortex-A53 cores, which are manufactured in a modern 14-nm process. Compared to the previous 28-nm-SoCs, the performance was increased and the power consumption is 30 % lower according to Samsung. The integrated LZE Cat.6 modem reaches transfer rates of up to 300 Mbps (downstream) and 50 Mbps (upstream). The dual-channel memory controller supports LPDDR3-1866 RAM.

The graphics adapter ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (core clock of 700 MHz according to Wikipedia) is also used in combination with the HiSilicon Kirin 650 SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.2, it also supports OpenCL 1.2 as well as DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). The performance is sufficient for common Android games from 2016 at medium details.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 626

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 626

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 (SD626) is a mid-range octa-core SoC with eight ARM Cortex-A53 cpu cores at up to 2.2 GHz, an Adreno 506 GPU, a DDR3L-1866 memory controller and a X9 LTE (Cat 7, 4G+, 300 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up) modem. Furthermore, the chip supports 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 4.1. It is manufactured in 14nm FinFet. The processor performance should be a bit higher than the average Snapdragon 625, due to the 200 MHz higher maximum clock speed.

ModelSamsung Exynos 7870 OctaQualcomm Snapdragon 626
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameA53Cortex-A53
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Samsung Exynos 7880 compare1.9 GHz8 / 8 cores A53
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa « 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1600 MHz2200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-T830 GPU, 8x Cortex-A53 1.6 GHz, LTE Cat.6, 14 nm, dual-channel memory controller LPDDR3-1866Adreno 506 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. 7, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T830 MP2 (700 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 506
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
11467 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11005 Points (9%)
134%
626 +
min: 16939     avg: 17078     median: 17084 (14%)     max: 17204 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1595     avg: 1679     median: 1709 (7%)     max: 1776 Points
122%
626 +
min: 2045     avg: 2079     median: 2083.5 (8%)     max: 2105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1601     avg: 1675     median: 1674 (19%)     max: 1762 Points
125%
626 +
min: 2065     avg: 2086     median: 2085.5 (24%)     max: 2107 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 626 +
187 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 626 +
1098 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 726     avg: 732     median: 732 (7%)     max: 736 Points
127%
626 +
min: 907     avg: 926     median: 928.5 (9%)     max: 939 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3704     avg: 3728     median: 3710 (4%)     max: 3777 Points
121%
626 +
min: 4369     avg: 4481     median: 4496.5 (5%)     max: 4562 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 680     avg: 696     median: 682 (9%)     max: 726 Points
130%
626 +
889 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3277     avg: 3285     median: 3284.5 (8%)     max: 3292 Points
133%
626 +
4362 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
4169 Points (7%)
115%
626 +
4804 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
753 Points (11%)
111%
626 +
837 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 626 +
868 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 626 +
1883 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 626 +
7485 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 626 +
4212 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 626 +
4557 Points (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 6784     avg: 9156     median: 9670 (11%)     max: 11916 ms
101%
626 +
min: 7667     avg: 8504     median: 8761.5 (10%)     max: 8825 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3721     avg: 4164     median: 3880 (3%)     max: 4968 Points
121%
626 +
min: 4424     avg: 4760     median: 4705.5 (4%)     max: 5204 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 31     avg: 31.5     median: 31.5 (7%)     max: 32 Points
146%
626 +
min: 63428     avg: 66058     median: 66613 (23%)     max: 67578 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 4775     avg: 5190     median: 5140.5 (16%)     max: 5703 Points
105%
626 +
5406 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 15443     avg: 16057     median: 16019 (20%)     max: 16745 Points
134%
626 +
21477 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 8143     avg: 8405     median: 8393.5 (3%)     max: 8688 Points
163%
626 +
13693 Points (4%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 31778     avg: 32396     median: 32448 (20%)     max: 32911 Points
129%
626 +
41767 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 61794     avg: 62047     median: 61818 (11%)     max: 62758 Points
133%
626 +
82343 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
min: 669     avg: 719     median: 718.5 (14%)     max: 768 min
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2016     avg: 2023     median: 2024 (11%)     max: 2030 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 3440     avg: 3508     median: 3536 (8%)     max: 3549 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 3722     avg: 3800     median: 3799 (25%)     max: 3889 Points
129%
626 +
min: 4660     avg: 4848     median: 4903 (32%)     max: 4924 Points
119%
626 +
min: 5621     avg: 5849     median: 5839 (29%)     max: 6096 Points

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 → 126% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 22:17:27

#0 checking url part for id 8118 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9196 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8118 +0.003s ... 0.027s

#7 got single benchmarks 8118 +0.025s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9196 +0.003s ... 0.055s

#9 got single benchmarks 9196 +0.011s ... 0.066s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.066s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.127s ... 0.193s

#12 return log +0.026s ... 0.219s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)