Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad vs Texas Instruments OMAP 4470

Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad

► remove from comparison Samsung 4412 Quad

The Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (also called Exynos 4412, introduced in 2012) is an ARM SoC for tablets and smartphones. It includes a quad-core processor based on the Cortex-A9 architecture (including NEON SIMD extension), which clocks with 1.4 to 1.6 GHz (depending on the model). Thus, the computing power is similar to competitors like Nvidia's Tegra 3 SoC. The memory controller supports LPDDR2, DDR2 and DDR3 with a maximum of two 32-bit channels and 400 MHz clock speed, resulting in a bandwidth of up to 6.4 GB/s.

The SoC integrates an ARM Mali-400 MP4 GPU (15.8 GFLOPS at 440 MHz). Typical smartphone games (2012) will run fluently even in high resolutions like 1280 x 720 pixels. Videos can be accelerated by a multi-format video decoder (1080p AVI, WMV, H.264, H.263, VC1, MPEG2, MPEG4).

The chip is produced in Samsung fabs in 32nm HKMG and mainly found in high-end devices like the Samsung Galaxy S3 or Note 2. Depending on the clock speed, the power consumption should be between 2 and 4 W (estimated).

Texas Instruments OMAP 4470

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4470

The OMAP 4470 is a fourth generation SoC (System on Chip) developed by Texas Instruments (TI) for use in mobile phones and tablets. The 45 nm chip includes dual ARM Cortex-A9 CPU cores running at 1.3 GHz up to 1.8 GHz on an ARM v7 instruction set and ARM NEON SIMD (Single instruction, multiple data) engine. 

The SoC integrates an SGX540 GPU from PowerVR clocked at 277 - 384 MHz, which can utilize the same 400 MHz dual-channel LPDDR2 memory controller as the two core processors. Compared to the OMAP 4430, the 4470 is clocked higher on both the CPU and GPU.

ModelSamsung Exynos 4412 QuadTexas Instruments OMAP 4470
SeriesSamsung Exynos
CodenameCortex A9Cortex A9
Series: Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad « 1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Apple A5 compare1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Clock1400 - 1600 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
Technology32 nm45 nm
FeaturesNEON, Mali 400MP4, Memory ControllerDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal Processor
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.com
L1 Cache1 MB

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 8282     avg: 9127     median: 9127 (7%)     max: 9972 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 613     avg: 693     median: 698 (6%)     max: 795 Points
min: 436     avg: 438     median: 438 (4%)     max: 440 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 783     avg: 1234     median: 1282 (12%)     max: 1646 Points
min: 1302     avg: 1326     median: 1325.5 (12%)     max: 1349 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 2661     avg: 2896     median: 2911.5 (6%)     max: 3171 Points
min: 1895     avg: 1929     median: 1929 (4%)     max: 1963 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1537     avg: 1675     median: 1656.5 (3%)     max: 1816 Points
min: 1118     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (2%)     max: 1153 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1804     avg: 1915     median: 1886.5 (5%)     max: 2146 Points
min: 1367     avg: 1381     median: 1381 (4%)     max: 1395 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 69.8     avg: 148.8     median: 162.8 (6%)     max: 202.1 MFLOPS
min: 80.5     avg: 87.6     median: 87.6 (3%)     max: 94.6 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 53.2     avg: 58.4     median: 56.3 (6%)     max: 66.9 MFLOPS
min: 52.5     avg: 55.4     median: 55.4 (5%)     max: 58.3 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1109 ms (12%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1027     avg: 1304     median: 1353 (13%)     max: 1574 ms
min: 1438     avg: 1497     median: 1497 (14%)     max: 1556 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4918     avg: 5460     median: 5357 (12%)     max: 6207 points
min: 2747     avg: 3447     median: 3447 (8%)     max: 4147 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4282     avg: 6753     median: 7142.5 (46%)     max: 7770 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
289 Iter./s (9%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
10134 Iter./s (33%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
10466 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 → 77% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 07:02:29

#0 checking url part for id 3331 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3647 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:39:24 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.07s ... 0.071s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.071s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3331 +0.003s ... 0.074s

#7 got single benchmarks 3331 +0.023s ... 0.097s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3647 +0.004s ... 0.1s

#9 got single benchmarks 3647 +0.012s ... 0.113s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.113s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.068s ... 0.181s

#12 return log +0.038s ... 0.219s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)