Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 400 APQ8026

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 is an entry-level ARM-SoC for Android smartphones and smartwatches. It integrates four Cortex-A7 cores at up to 1.2 GHz (Quad-Core) and a Adreno 305 graphics card at 450 MHz. Furthermore, Bluetooth 4.0 is integrated in the SoC.

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

► remove from comparison  Kirin 9000W

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000W is an SoC that can be used in smartphones and tablets based on Android and was first installed in the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2.

Huawei does not reveal any information about the SoC. The little information that is available comes from benchmarks and system analysis tools. The CPU consists of three clusters with a total of 12 cores. The power-saving cluster has four ARM Cortex-A510 cores, each operating at up to 1,530 MHz, while six other cores use unspecified cores from HiSilicon (0x0D42) and clock at up to 2,150 MHz. The third cluster contains two HiSilicon cores (0x0D02), each with a maximum clock speed of 2,487 MHz. The performance cores could possibly be based on the TaiShan V120 architecture (as in the Kirin 9000S).

The single-core performance is correspondingly mixed, but the multi-core performance is at the level of a high-end SoC from 2022 due to the numerous cores.

A Maleoon 910 by HiSilicon is integrated as the graphics unit, similar to the 9000S (where it was clocked with up to 750MHz).

Nothing concrete is known about the manufacturing process or the architecture. The SoC will probably be manufactured in 7 nm at SMIC.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameARMv7
Series:
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8028 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 « 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8230 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227 compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8660 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8260 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8250 compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores ARMv7
newitem compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W « 1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Clock1200 MHz1530 - 2490 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 412 / 12
2 x 2.5 GHz
6 x 2.2 GHz
4 x 1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Technology28 nm7 nm
FeaturesBluetooth 4.0
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 305 (450 MHz)HiSilicon Maleoon 910
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
6749 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
6667 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
7226 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5690 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
5614 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1174 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
4088 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
867 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3878 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4712 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
13978 Points (15%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1075 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
327 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
272 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1192 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
1803 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1093 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1279 Points (3%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
242.3 MFLOPS (8%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
85.2 MFLOPS (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
16134 ms (19%)
1202 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1137 ms (12%)
203.8 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
1157 ms (11%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
1810 Points (2%)
33982 Points (31%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
99 Points (28%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
755 Points (20%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1152 Points (26%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1546 Points (20%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
8236 points (19%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
17735 Points (41%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
17247 Points (17%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
655341 Points (40%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
182634 Points (50%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
308 Iter./s (9%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
6098 Iter./s (20%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
6717 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
110.5 MB/s (81%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
1435 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
63.2 MB/s (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1522 MB/s (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
45015 Points (71%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
10620 Points (49%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
834 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
8.2 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.2 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 9000W → 704% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 14. 10:39:22

#0 checking url part for id 6436 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17388 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.069s ... 0.07s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.07s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6436 +0.005s ... 0.075s

#7 got single benchmarks 6436 +0.012s ... 0.087s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17388 +0.004s ... 0.091s

#9 got single benchmarks 17388 +0.008s ... 0.099s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.099s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.178s ... 0.277s

#12 return log +0.082s ... 0.36s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)