Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-370M vs Intel Core i3-390M

Intel Core i3-370M

► remove from comparison Intel 370M

The Intel Core i3-370M is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops and clocks with 2.4 GHz. The difference to the Core i5 and i7 series is the lacking TurboBoost overclocking, and the missing AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution functions. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). 

A feature of the new Core i3-370M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and the memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i3-370M should be between a 2.5 and 2.6 GHz Core 2 Duo (upper class CPUs in the last year). This is mainly due to the efficient HyperThreading function and the integrated memory controller. In single threaded applications it should be at least as fast, as a similar clocked Core 2 Duo.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-667 MHz (due to Turbo Boost) and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. The Core i5 and i7 models should still be a bit faster because of the higher max. clock speed of the GPU. The performance of the graphics in 3D should be on par with a Radeon HD 4200 but the driver support is usually worse.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone).

Intel Core i3-390M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-390M is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops and clocks with 2.67 GHz. The difference to the Core i5 and i7 series is the lacking TurboBoost overclocking, and the missing AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution functions. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). 

A feature of the new Core i3-390M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and the memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i3-390M should be at a level of a 2.7-2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo (upper class CPUs in the last year). This is mainly due to the efficient HyperThreading function and the integrated memory controller. In single threaded applications it should be at least as fast, as a similar clocked Core 2 Duo.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-667 MHz (due to Turbo Boost) and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. The Core i5 and i7 models should still be a bit faster because of the higher max. clock speed of the GPU. The performance of the graphics in 3D should be on par with a Radeon HD 4200 but the driver support is usually worse.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone).

ModelIntel Core i3-370MIntel Core i3-390M
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core i3
CodenameArrandaleArrandale
Series: Core i3 Arrandale
Intel Core i3-390M2.67 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-380M compare2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-370M « 2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-350M compare2.26 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-330M compare2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-380UM compare1.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-330UM compare1.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-390M « 2.67 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-380M compare2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-370M2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-350M compare2.26 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-330M compare2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-380UM compare1.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-330UM compare1.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock2400 MHz2667 MHz
FSB25002500
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 4
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors382+177 Million382+177 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm
Die Size81+114 mm281+114 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C90 (rPGA), 105 (BGA) °C
SocketBGA1288, PGA988BGA1288, PGA988
FeaturesHyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 667MHz,Intel HD Graphics (500-667MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
370M +
min: 1.58     avg: 1.9     median: 2 (3%)     max: 1.99 Points
110%
390M +
2.2 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
370M +
min: 2623     avg: 2680     median: 2690 (16%)     max: 2711 Points
105%
390M +
2829 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
370M +
min: 6090     avg: 6216     median: 6203.5 (4%)     max: 6506 Points
103%
390M +
6405 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
370M +
min: 7276     avg: 7479     median: 7505 (5%)     max: 7603 Points
102%
390M +
7623 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
370M +
min: 3174     avg: 3301     median: 3322 (4%)     max: 3373 Points
106%
390M +
3534 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
370M +
min: 639     avg: 675     median: 659.5 (8%)     max: 737 s
100%
390M +
682 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
370M +
min: 20.3     avg: 21.7     median: 21.2 (4%)     max: 24 s
100%
390M +
22.5 s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
370M +
min: 2525     avg: 2574     median: 2578 (5%)     max: 2614 Points
109%
390M +
2811 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
370M +
min: 17.6     avg: 18.1     median: 18 (4%)     max: 19 s
100%
390M +
17 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
370M +
min: 41.2     avg: 42.4     median: 42 (2%)     max: 46 s
100%
390M +
40 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
370M +
min: 978     avg: 989     median: 990 (4%)     max: 999 s
100%
390M +
941 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
370M +
min: 30380     avg: 32380     median: 32380 (15%)     max: 34380 MIPS
121%
390M +
39140 MIPS (19%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
370M +
min: 25000     avg: 25350     median: 25350 (19%)     max: 25700 MFLOPS
108%
390M +
27400 MFLOPS (21%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 370M +
min: 4991     avg: 5190     median: 5083 (10%)     max: 5496 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
370M +
min: 6.6     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (86%)     max: 6.7 Points
101%
390M +
6.8 Points (87%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 370M +
min: 6676     avg: 6882     median: 6885 (6%)     max: 6994 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-370M → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-390M → 105% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 03:34:41

#0 checking url part for id 1065 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1527 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.014s ... 0.015s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1065 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#7 got single benchmarks 1065 +0.116s ... 0.134s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1527 +0.003s ... 0.137s

#9 got single benchmarks 1527 +0.01s ... 0.147s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.147s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.112s ... 0.258s

#12 return log +0.035s ... 0.293s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)