, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i3-330UM vs Intel Core i3-370M

Intel Core i3-330UM

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-330UM is a Ultra Low Voltage dual-core processor for small and light laptops. It is clocked with 1.2 GHz and does not feature Turbo Boost to overclock the CPU cores. Another feature missing compared to the i5 and i7 lineup is the AES function block. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). 

A feature of the new Core i3-330UM is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process. The also called GMA HD is able to use Turbo Boost to overclock from 133 to 500 MHz.

Due to the integrated memory controller and HyperThreading, the  Core i3-330UM is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo (1.2 GHz) in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. Therefore it should beat the 1.3 GHz Pentium SU7300. Still the gaming performance will suffer from the low clock speed.

The power consumption of 18 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 17 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo SL-series (CPU alone).

 

Intel Core i3-370M

► remove from comparison Intel 370M

The Intel Core i3-370M is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops and clocks with 2.4 GHz. The difference to the Core i5 and i7 series is the lacking TurboBoost overclocking, and the missing AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution functions. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). 

A feature of the new Core i3-370M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and the memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i3-370M should be between a 2.5 and 2.6 GHz Core 2 Duo (upper class CPUs in the last year). This is mainly due to the efficient HyperThreading function and the integrated memory controller. In single threaded applications it should be at least as fast, as a similar clocked Core 2 Duo.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-667 MHz (due to Turbo Boost) and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. The Core i5 and i7 models should still be a bit faster because of the higher max. clock speed of the GPU. The performance of the graphics in 3D should be on par with a Radeon HD 4200 but the driver support is usually worse.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone).

Intel Core i3-330UMIntel Core i3-370M
Intel Core i3Intel Core i3
ArrandaleArrandale
Series: Core i3 Arrandale
Intel Core i3-390M compare2.67 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-380M compare2.53 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-370M2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-350M compare2.26 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-330M compare2.13 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-380UM compare1.33 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i3-330UM1.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-390M compare2.67 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-380M compare2.53 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i3-370M2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-350M compare2.26 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-330M compare2.13 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-380UM compare1.33 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-330UM1.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
1200 MHz2400 MHz
25002500
512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 4
18 35
382+177 382+177
32 32
81+114 mm281+114 mm2
105 °C105 °C
BGA1288BGA1288, PGA988
Intel HD Graphics 166-500MHz, DDR3-800 Memory Controller, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access, Execute Disable BitHyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 667MHz,
Architecturex86x86
Intel Core i3 330UMIntel Core i3 370M

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1 Points (2%)
202%
370M +
min: 1.58     avg: 1.9     median: 2 (4%)     max: 1.99 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1293     avg: 1297     median: 1297 (12%)     max: 1301
207%
370M +
min: 2623     avg: 2680     median: 2690 (24%)     max: 2711
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2847     avg: 2982     median: 2982 (5%)     max: 3117
208%
370M +
min: 6090     avg: 6216     median: 6203.5 (10%)     max: 6506
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 3779     avg: 3796     median: 3796 (4%)     max: 3813 Points
198%
370M +
min: 7276     avg: 7479     median: 7505 (7%)     max: 7603 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1629     avg: 1665     median: 1664.5 (12%)     max: 1700 Points
200%
370M +
min: 3174     avg: 3301     median: 3322 (23%)     max: 3373 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1310     avg: 1325     median: 1323.4 (16%)     max: 1340.98 s
109%
370M +
min: 639.4     avg: 675     median: 659.5 (8%)     max: 737 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 42     avg: 42.6     median: 42.7 (9%)     max: 43.135 s
105%
370M +
min: 20.3     avg: 21.7     median: 21.2 (4%)     max: 24 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1299     avg: 1310     median: 1301 (7%)     max: 1331 Points
198%
370M +
min: 2525     avg: 2574     median: 2578 (14%)     max: 2614 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 35     avg: 36.1     median: 36.1 (8%)     max: 37.3 s
104%
370M +
min: 17.6     avg: 18.1     median: 18 (4%)     max: 19 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 79     avg: 81.7     median: 82.7 (4%)     max: 83.5 s
102%
370M +
min: 41.2     avg: 42.4     median: 42 (2%)     max: 46 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1843     avg: 1876     median: 1875.9 (8%)     max: 1908.77 s
104%
370M +
min: 978.465     avg: 989     median: 990 (4%)     max: 999 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 14690     avg: 16150     median: 16150 (8%)     max: 17610 MIPS
200%
370M +
min: 30380     avg: 32380     median: 32380 (15%)     max: 34380 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 12400     avg: 12510     median: 12510 (10%)     max: 12620 MFLOPS
203%
370M +
min: 25000     avg: 25350     median: 25350 (19%)     max: 25700 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 370M +
min: 4991     avg: 5190     median: 5083 (32%)     max: 5496 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 4.1     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (53%)     max: 4.2 Points
161%
370M +
min: 6.6     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (86%)     max: 6.7 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3540 Points (4%)
194%
370M +
min: 6676     avg: 6882     median: 6885 (8%)     max: 6994 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-330UM → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-370M → 166% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 22. 12:44:12

#0 checking url part for id 997 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1065 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 997 +0s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 997 +0.013s ... 0.02s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1065 +0s ... 0.02s

#9 got single benchmarks 1065 +0.048s ... 0.069s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.069s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.082s

#12 return log +0.003s ... 0.085s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)