Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 2981U vs Intel Celeron 2970M

Intel Celeron 2981U

► remove from comparison Intel 2981U

The Intel Celeron 2981U is an entry level, ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core processor clocked at 1.6 GHz which has been presented in Q1 2014. It is based on the Haswell architecture and manufactured in 22nm. Compared to the Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs, many features like Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, AVX and AES-NI are deactivated. In contrast to the very similar Celeron 2980U, the 2981U supports Wireless Display (WiDi) as well as Quick Sync.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving performance per clock by almost 10 percent.

The performance of the Celeron 2981U is similar to the old and slightly higher clocked Celeron 1037U, which is based on Ivy Bridge. The CPU has sufficient power for most office and multimedia purposes.

The integrated HD Graphics (Haswell) offers 10 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 200 - 1000 MHz (with Turbo Boost), making it somewhat faster than the former HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). However, the HD Graphics (Haswell) is significantly slower than the HD Graphics 4400 and HD Graphics 5000 of other Haswell ULV models.

The Celeron 2981U is rated at a TDP of 15 W including graphics card, memory controller, VRMs and the integrated chipset.  Therefore, the CPU is suited for small ultrabooks 11-inches or greater.

Intel Celeron 2970M

► remove from comparison Intel 2970M

The Intel Celeron 2970M is an entry-level dual-core processor clocked at 2.2 GHz that has been launched in Q2/2014. It is based on the Haswell architecture and is manufactured in 22nm. Compared to the Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs, many features like Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, AVX and AES-NI are disabled.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving performance per clock by almost 10 percent.

The performance of the Celeron 2970M is similar to the old and somewhat higher clocked Ivy Bridge-based Pentium 2020M. The CPU has sufficient power for office and multimedia purposes as well as most other applications.

The integrated HD Graphics (Haswell) offers 10 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 400 - 1100 MHz, making it somewhat faster than the former HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). However, the HD Graphics (Haswell) is significantly slower than the HD Graphics 4600 found on a number of other Haswell dual-cores.

The Celeron 2970M is rated at a TDP of 37 W including the graphics card, memory controller and the VRMs. Therefore, the CPU is suited for medium-sized notebooks 13 - 14 inches or greater.

ModelIntel Celeron 2981UIntel Celeron 2970M
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameHaswellHaswell
Series: Celeron Haswell
Intel Celeron 2970M2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2950M compare2 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 2981U1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2980U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2957U compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2955U compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2961Y compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 2970M2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2950M compare2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2981U1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2980U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2957U compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2955U compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2961Y compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Clock1600 MHz2200 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP15 Watt37 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
SocketBGArPGA
FeaturesHD Graphics (200 - 1000 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, Virtualization, Wireless Display, Quick SyncHD Graphics (400 - 1100 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, Virtualization
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) (400 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 2981UIntel Celeron 2970M
Transistors960 Million
Die Size130 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
$75 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 2970M +
164 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 2970M +
85 Points (29%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 2970M +
1.9 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 2970M +
1 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 2970M +
3222 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 2970M +
6248 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 2970M +
1062 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 2970M +
33.5 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 2970M +
1410 Points (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 2970M +
11.7 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 2970M +
62.5 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 2970M +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 2970M +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 2970M +
0.2 GB/s (1%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 2970M +
3401 Seconds (24%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 2970M +
2489 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 2970M +
17.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 2970M +
38.6 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 2970M +
846 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 2970M +
min: 2256     avg: 2273     median: 2272.5 (8%)     max: 2289 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 2970M +
min: 17401     avg: 17747     median: 17747 (15%)     max: 18093 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 2970M +
min: 1514     avg: 1523     median: 1522.5 (4%)     max: 1531 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 2970M +
min: 2080     avg: 2125     median: 2124.5 (5%)     max: 2169 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 2970M +
900 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 2970M +
3783 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 2970M +
2127 Points (43%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 2970M +
2343 Points (36%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 2970M +
3909 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 2970M +
2515 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 2970M +
4235 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 2970M → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 00:49:27

#0 checking url part for id 4744 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5867 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s ... 0.009s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.01s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.015s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.015s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 4744 +0s ... 0.015s

#17 got single benchmarks 4744 +0s ... 0.015s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 5867 +0s ... 0.016s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.017s

#21 got single benchmarks 5867 +0.008s ... 0.025s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#57 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.036s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#59 return log +0.004s ... 0.04s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)