Intel Celeron 2950M vs Intel Celeron 2957U

Intel Celeron 2950M

► remove Intel 2950M

The Intel Celeron 2950M is an entry-level dual-core processor clocked at 2.0 GHz and was launched in Fall 2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and is manufactured in 22nm. Compared to the Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs, many features like Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, AVX and AES-NI are disabled.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving performance per clock by almost 10 percent.

The performance of the Celeron 2950M is slightly below the old and somewhat higher clocked Ivy Bridge-based Pentium 2020M. The CPU has sufficient power for office and multimedia purposes as well as most other applications.

The integrated HD Graphics (Haswell) offers 10 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 400 - 1100 MHz, making it somewhat faster than the former HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). However, the HD Graphics (Haswell) is significantly slower than the HD Graphics 4600 found on a number of other Haswell dual-cores.

The Celeron 2950M is rated at a TDP of 37 W including the graphics card, memory controller and the VRMs. Therefore, the CPU is suited for medium-sized notebooks 13 - 14 inches or greater.

Intel Celeron 2957U

► remove Intel 2957U

The Intel Celeron 2957U is an entry level, ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core processor clocked at 1.4 GHz which has been presented in Q1 2014. It is based on the Haswell architecture and manufactured in 22nm. Compared to the Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs, many features like Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, AVX and AES-NI are deactivated. In contrast to the very similar Celeron 2955U, the 2957U supports Wireless Display (WiDi) as well as Quick Sync.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving performance per clock by almost 10 percent.

The performance of the Celeron 2957U is similar to the old and slightly higher clocked Celeron 1007U, which is based on Ivy Bridge. The CPU has sufficient power for simple office and multimedia purposes.

The integrated HD Graphics (Haswell) offers 10 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 200 - 1000 MHz, making it somewhat faster than the former HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). However, the HD Graphics (Haswell) is significantly slower than the HD Graphics 4400 and HD Graphics 5000 of other Haswell ULV models.

The Celeron 2957U is rated at a TDP of 15 W including graphics card, memory controller, VRMs and the integrated chipset.  Therefore, the CPU is suited for small ultrabooks 11-inches or greater.

Intel Celeron 2950MIntel Celeron 2957U
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
HaswellHaswell
: Celeron Haswell
Intel Celeron 2970M compare2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 2950M2000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2981U compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2980U compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2957U1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2955U compare1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2961Y compare1100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2970M compare2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2950M2000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2981U compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2980U compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 2957U1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2955U compare1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2961Y compare1100 MHz2 / 22 MB
2000 MHz1400 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
37 15
960
22 22
130 mm2
100 °C
rPGABGA1168
HD Graphics (400 - 1100 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, VirtualizationHD Graphics (200 - 1000 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, Virtualization, Wireless Display, Quick Sync
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Haswell) (400 - 1100 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz)
$75 U.S.$107 U.S.
Intel Celeron 2950MIntel Celeron 2957U

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
1 2957U +
105 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
1 2957U +
55 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
1 2957U +
1.2 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
1 2957U +
0.6 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
1 2957U +
2077 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
1 2957U +
4043 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
100%
1 2957U +
5080 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
100%
1 2957U +
2714 Points (25%)
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m *
100%
1 2957U +
1686 seconds (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - 32m *
100%
1 2957U +
53.5 seconds (11%)
WinRAR - Result
100%
1 2957U +
1058 KB/s (11%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
100%
1 2957U +
7.6 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
100%
1 2957U +
41.3 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
100%
1 2957U +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
100%
1 2957U +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
100%
1 2957U +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M *
100%
1 2957U +
26.6 Seconds (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M *
100%
1 2957U +
59 Seconds (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M *
100%
1 2957U +
1303 Seconds (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - Dhrystone
100%
1 2957U +
24000 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - Whetstone
100%
1 2957U +
10450 MFLOPS (8%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
100%
1 2957U +
1524 points (7%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
1 2957U +
11407 Points (7%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
1 2957U +
992 Points (3%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
100%
1 2957U +
1342 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
100%
1 2957U +
4377 Points (35%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
100%
1 2957U +
3572 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
100%
1 2957U +
2380 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
100%
1 2957U +
2385 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
100%
1 2957U +
2819 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
1 2957U +
2208 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
1 2957U +
1283 Points (26%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 2957U → NAN% n=

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.14
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)