Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 1037U vs Intel Atom N2600

Intel Celeron 1037U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1037U is an entry level, Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1037U is just slightly slower than the 2.0 GHz Pentium B940.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the memory controller. Therefore, the 1037U is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Atom N2600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom N2600 is a dual core entry level processor for netbooks and tablets. It was officially announced in December 2011 after some troubles with the graphics drivers (according to rumors). 

The N2600 features a PowerVR SGX545 based graphics card (at 400MHz) named Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 and a video decoding engine for MPEG4 Part2, VC-1, WMV9, and H.264. Furthermore, the chip now also supports DisplayPort 1.1 and HDMI 1.3a outputs.

The processor core is still similar to the old Atom processors. Therefore the performance of the N2600 is comparable to an older Atom N570.

The integrated 64Bit Single-Channel DDR3-800/1067 memory controller supports two SODIMMS and a maximum of 2 GB RAM.

ModelIntel Celeron 1037UIntel Atom N2600
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
CodenameIvy BridgeCedarview-M
Series: Atom Cedarview-M
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U « 1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Intel Atom N2850 compare2 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2800 compare1.86 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2650 compare1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2600 « 1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores
Clock1800 MHz1600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB
L3 Cache2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP17 Watt3.5 Watt
Technology22 nm32 nm
Die Size94 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA559
FeaturesHD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitGMA 3600 (400MHz), Single Channel Memory Controller (2GB DDR3)
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$86 U.S.$47 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 1037U +
1.5 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 1037U +
0.8 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2500 Points (15%)
min: 531     avg: 540     median: 541 (3%)     max: 547 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4824 Points (3%)
min: 1434     avg: 1513     median: 1527.5 (1%)     max: 1562 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 1037U +
6107 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 1037U +
3165 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1304 s (15%)
2064 s (24%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
41.5 s (8%)
66 s (13%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 1037U +
1276 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
8.5 fps (3%)
9.9 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
46.8 fps (11%)
9.8 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 1037U +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 1037U +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 1037U +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1903 Points (4%)
min: 795     avg: 812     median: 812 (2%)     max: 829 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
21.5 s (5%)
92 s (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
47.2 s (2%)
204 s (9%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1091 s (5%)
4541 s (20%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
22380 MIPS (11%)
8139 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
13360 MFLOPS (10%)
6745 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N2600 +
1631 Points (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
5.8 Points (74%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
4744 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1880 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 1037U +
13626 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 1037U +
1225 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 1037U +
1651 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 1037U +
4937 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 1037U +
4278 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 1037U +
3032 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 1037U +
2850 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 1037U +
3408 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1037U → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N2600 → 55% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 09:49:54

#0 checking url part for id 3719 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2684 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3719 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#7 got single benchmarks 3719 +0.013s ... 0.045s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2684 +0.004s ... 0.049s

#9 got single benchmarks 2684 +0.024s ... 0.073s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.147s ... 0.22s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.23s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.27s

#14 return log +0.035s ... 0.305s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)