Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 1037U vs Intel Celeron 1017U vs Intel Celeron 1019Y

Intel Celeron 1037U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1037U is an entry level, Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1037U is just slightly slower than the 2.0 GHz Pentium B940.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the memory controller. Therefore, the 1037U is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 1017U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1017U is an entry-level, Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual-core processor clocked at 1.6 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set compared to the faster Core processors. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are all disabled.

Compared to previous generations, the 1017U is similar to a Celeron B820 in terms of performance.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the memory controller. Therefore, the 1017U is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 1019Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1019Y is an entry-level ULV processor for ultrabooks and tablets. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture, but with many core features disabled including Turbo Boost, Virtualization VT-d, HyperThreading, AES and Trusted Execution. Every core offers a clock speed of 1.0 GHz and, as with other dual-core Celeron CPUs, the 1019Y offers 2 MB of L3 Cache.

Ivy Bridge is an enhanced die shrink of the Sandy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm (versus 32nm Sandy Bridge CPUs) and are the first to introduce 3D transistors for increased energy efficiency when compared to similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processors. Other new features are integrated PCI Express 3.0 and  DDR3(L)-1600 support.

The performance of a Celeron 1019Y should be slightly above a similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processor due to slight architectural improvements. As a result, overall performance should be just a bit below that of the Pentium 957.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics offers 6 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 350 MHz up to 800 MHz with Turbo Boost.

The 1019Y is rated at a TDP of 10 W including the integrated graphics card and memory controller. Therefore, the CPU is best suited for tablets and ultrabooks.

ModelIntel Celeron 1037UIntel Celeron 1017UIntel Celeron 1019Y
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameIvy BridgeIvy BridgeIvy Bridge
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Clock1800 MHz1600 MHz1000 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt17 Watt10 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
Die Size94 mm294 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA1023BGA
FeaturesHD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitVirtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$86 U.S.$153 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 1037UIntel Celeron 1017UIntel Celeron 1019Y

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 1037U +
1.5 Points (3%)
88%
1 1017U +
1.3 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 1037U +
0.8 Points (2%)
81%
1 1017U +
0.6 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 1037U +
2500 Points (22%)
88%
1 1017U +
2201 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 1037U +
4824 Points (7%)
86%
1 1017U +
4155 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 1037U +
6107 Points (5%)
86%
1 1017U +
5280 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 1037U +
3165 Points (19%)
88%
1 1017U +
2797 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 1037U +
1304 s (15%)
98%
1 1017U +
1449 s (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 1037U +
41.5 s (8%)
99%
1 1017U +
46.4 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 1037U +
1276 Points (7%)
90%
1 1017U +
1150 Points (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 1037U +
8.5 fps (4%)
89%
1 1017U +
7.6 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 1037U +
46.8 fps (13%)
89%
1 1017U +
41.9 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 1037U +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
80%
1 1017U +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 1037U +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
87%
1 1017U +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 1037U +
0.2 GB/s (1%)
89%
1 1017U +
0.1 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 1037U +
1903 Points (4%)
90%
1 1017U +
1719 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 1037U +
21.5 s (5%)
99%
1 1017U +
24.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 1037U +
47.2 s (2%)
100%
1 1017U +
53.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 1037U +
1091 s (5%)
99%
1 1017U +
1219 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 1037U +
22380 MIPS (11%)
88%
1 1017U +
19720 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 1037U +
13360 MFLOPS (10%)
88%
1 1017U +
11800 MFLOPS (9%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 1037U +
5.8 Points (74%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 1037U +
4744 Points (5%)
87%
1 1017U +
4130 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 1037U +
1880 Points (7%)
81%
1 1017U +
1532 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 1037U +
13626 Points (9%)
87%
1 1017U +
11797 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 1037U +
1225 Points (3%)
85%
1 1017U +
1041 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 1037U +
1651 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 1017U +
2308 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 1017U +
1367 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 1037U +
4937 Points (40%)
81%
1 1017U +
3985 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 1037U +
4278 Points (39%)
82%
1 1017U +
3500 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 1037U +
3032 Points (6%)
87%
1 1017U +
2631 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 1037U +
2850 Points (6%)
88%
1 1017U +
2494 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 1037U +
3408 Points (9%)
85%
1 1017U +
2892 Points (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1037U → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1017U → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 08. 03:44:38

#0 checking url part for id 3719 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3947 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3943 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#27 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#28 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 3719 +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 got single benchmarks 3719 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#33 getting avg benchmarks for device 3947 +0s ... 0.016s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#35 got single benchmarks 3947 +0.006s ... 0.022s

#36 getting avg benchmarks for device 3943 +0s ... 0.022s

#37 got single benchmarks 3943 +0s ... 0.023s

#38 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.024s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.035s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.035s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.041s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.045s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#100 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.046s

#101 return log +0s ... 0.046s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)