Intel Celeron 1037U vs Intel Celeron 1019Y

Intel Celeron 1037U

► remove

The Intel Celeron 1037U is an entry level, Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1037U is just slightly slower than the 2.0 GHz Pentium B940.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the memory controller. Therefore, the 1037U is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 1019Y

► remove

The Intel Celeron 1019Y is an entry-level ULV processor for ultrabooks and tablets. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture, but with many core features disabled including Turbo Boost, Virtualization VT-d, HyperThreading, AES and Trusted Execution. Every core offers a clock speed of 1.0 GHz and, as with other dual-core Celeron CPUs, the 1019Y offers 2 MB of L3 Cache.

Ivy Bridge is an enhanced die shrink of the Sandy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm (versus 32nm Sandy Bridge CPUs) and are the first to introduce 3D transistors for increased energy efficiency when compared to similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processors. Other new features are integrated PCI Express 3.0 and  DDR3(L)-1600 support.

The performance of a Celeron 1019Y should be slightly above a similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processor due to slight architectural improvements. As a result, overall performance should be just a bit below that of the Pentium 957.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics offers 6 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 350 MHz up to 800 MHz with Turbo Boost.

The 1019Y is rated at a TDP of 10 W including the integrated graphics card and memory controller. Therefore, the CPU is best suited for tablets and ultrabooks.

Intel Celeron 1037UIntel Celeron 1019Y
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Ivy BridgeIvy Bridge
: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1037U1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y1000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1500 MHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1019Y1000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1500 MHz1 / 11 MB
1800 MHz1000 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
17 10
22 22
94 mm2
105 °C105 °C
FCBGA1023BGA
HD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitVirtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)
$86 U.S.$153 U.S.
Intel Celeron 1037UIntel Celeron 1019Y

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.5 Points (3%)
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (29%)
0.8 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2500 (26%)
2500 (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4824 (8%)
4824 (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6107 Points (7%)
6107 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3165 Points (28%)
3165 Points (28%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1304 s (15%)
1304.1 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
41.5 s (8%)
41.5 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1276 (13%)
1276 (13%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
8.5 fps (5%)
8.5 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
46.8 fps (16%)
46.8 fps (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1903 Points (13%)
1903 Points (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
21.5 s (5%)
21.5 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
47.2 s (2%)
47.2 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1091 s (5%)
1091.4 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
22380 MIPS (11%)
22380 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
13360 MFLOPS (10%)
13360 MFLOPS (10%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
5.8 Points (74%)
5.8 Points (74%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
4744 Points (7%)
4744 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1880 Points (8%)
1880 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
13626 Points (9%)
13626 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1225 Points (3%)
1225 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1651 Points (5%)
1651 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4937 Points (40%)
4937 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4278 Points (39%)
4278 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3032 Points (6%)
3032 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2850 Points (6%)
2850 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3408 Points (9%)
3408 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1037U → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1019Y → 100% n=31

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)