Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom Z3795 vs Intel Atom Z3745 vs Intel Atom Z3680D

Intel Atom Z3795

► remove from comparison Intel Z3795

The Intel Atom Z3795 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.59 - 2.39 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. Compared to the Z3775, the Z3795 offers a slightly higher CPU base clock.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of 1.59 - 2.39 GHz, the Z3795 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. The Z3795 even beats some of the Kabini APUs like the AMD A4-5000, as well as ARM SoCs like Tegra 4 and the Snapdragon 800. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 778 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and comparable to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 (as found in the Snapdragon 600). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3745

► remove from comparison Intel Z3745

The Intel Atom Z3745 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.86 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. Compared to the Z3740, the Z3745 is based on the new C0 stepping and offers a slightly increased GPU clock rate.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3745 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3745 competes with Temash and Kabini APUs like the AMD A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 778 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games like World of Warcraft or Fifa will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3680D

► remove from comparison Intel Z3680D

The Intel Atom Z3680D is a power-efficient dual-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.33 - 2.0 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3680, the Z3680D offers a different memory controller and a lower display resolution.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Z3680D is faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Presumably, the Z3680D even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 688 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 1920 x 1200 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC should be rated at an SDP of about 2 W, which would indicate a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

ModelIntel Atom Z3795Intel Atom Z3745Intel Atom Z3680D
SeriesIntel AtomIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenameBay Trail-TBay Trail-TBay Trail-T
Series: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom Z3795 « 1.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37851.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37751.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770D1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37401.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735E1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735G1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3680D1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37851.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37751.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770D1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745 « 1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37401.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735E1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735G1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3680D1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37851.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37751.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770D1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37401.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735E1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735G1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3680D « 1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1590 - 2390 MHz1330 - 1860 MHz1330 - 2000 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB224 KB112 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 42 / 2
TDP<4 Watt<4 Watt4 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
SocketUTFCBGA1380UTFCBGA1380
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 778 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 778 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 688 MHz), Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick Sync
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 778 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 778 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 688 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$40 U.S.$32 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 118     avg: 127.7     median: 131 (1%)     max: 134 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 36     avg: 37     median: 37 (11%)     max: 38 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.61     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1220     avg: 1393.7     median: 1234 (7%)     max: 1727 Points
min: 929     avg: 947.7     median: 941 (6%)     max: 973 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3324     avg: 3715     median: 3715 (3%)     max: 4106 Points
min: 2491     avg: 3037.7     median: 3229 (2%)     max: 3393 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 1727     avg: 4390.3     median: 5683 (4%)     max: 5761 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1727     avg: 2950.7     median: 1732 (2%)     max: 5393 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1020 s (81%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 25.93     avg: 27.2     median: 27.2 (80%)     max: 28.4 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1075 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 7.12     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (3%)     max: 9.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 37.15     avg: 42.1     median: 42.1 (10%)     max: 47.13 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.124     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.125 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.193     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.195 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 0.885     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (2%)     max: 0.891 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2069     avg: 2145.5     median: 2145.5 (5%)     max: 2222 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 36.26     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (149%)     max: 24.58 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 79.6     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (165%)     max: 48.81 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1732     avg: 1734.5     median: 1734.5 (160%)     max: 1081 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3552 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1141     avg: 1385.5     median: 1301 (4%)     max: 1799 Points
min: 1005     avg: 1183.3     median: 1261 (3%)     max: 1284 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
18838 Points (15%)
min: 0     avg: 11965.6     median: 14758 (12%)     max: 15195 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 14732     avg: 15505.2     median: 15528 (13%)     max: 16016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
20794 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1186     avg: 1234     median: 1255 (4%)     max: 1261 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1783 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 1715     avg: 1772     median: 1772 (14%)     max: 1829 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1590     avg: 1660     median: 1660 (15%)     max: 1730 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 2321     avg: 2723.5     median: 2723.5 (5%)     max: 3126 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1457     avg: 1759     median: 1759 (4%)     max: 2061 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1811     avg: 2077.5     median: 2077.5 (5%)     max: 2344 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 8367     avg: 8367     median: 8367 (437%)     max: 1914 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 388.3     avg: 388.3     median: 388.3 (141%)     max: 275.6 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
3353 Points (3%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 20763     avg: 26176     median: 27592 (211%)     max: 13067 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 37>24.58 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.168s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 81>48.81 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.17s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1737>1081 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.173s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 24.2> for benchmark 10, setting:2277 +0s ... 0.174s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 12.2> for benchmark 11, setting:2278 +0s ... 0.176s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 620> for benchmark 118, setting:435 +0s ... 0.232s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 260> for benchmark 118, setting:434 +0s ... 0.235s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 8367>1914 for benchmark 241, setting:699 +0s ... 0.237s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 15635>1914 for benchmark 241, setting:699 +0s ... 0.24s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 388.3>275.6 for benchmark 124, setting:649 +0s ... 0.242s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 753>275.6 for benchmark 124, setting:649 +0s ... 0.245s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 713> for benchmark 124, setting:437 +0s ... 0.247s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1213> for benchmark 281, setting:792 +0s ... 0.253s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1581> for benchmark 281, setting:791 +0s ... 0.255s

#14 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3108> for benchmark 281, setting:790 +0s ... 0.257s

#15 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 19418> for benchmark 123, setting:436 +0s ... 0.259s

#16 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 34810> for benchmark 238, setting:693 +0s ... 0.261s

#17 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 37656> for benchmark 292, setting:819 +0s ... 0.262s

#18 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 34692> for benchmark 364, setting:978 +0s ... 0.264s

#19 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 992> for benchmark 222, setting:657 +0s ... 0.266s

#20 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 17784> for benchmark 222, setting:656 +0s ... 0.268s

#21 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 28757>13067 for benchmark 200, setting:595 +0s ... 0.27s

#22 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4298> for benchmark 318, setting:869 +0s ... 0.272s

log 10. 05:38:57

#0 checking url part for id 5968 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5933 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4580 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:38:24 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.059s ... 0.06s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.06s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5968 +0.003s ... 0.063s

#8 got single benchmarks 5968 +0.014s ... 0.077s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5933 +0.003s ... 0.08s

#10 got single benchmarks 5933 +0.031s ... 0.111s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 4580 +0.003s ... 0.114s

#12 got single benchmarks 4580 +0s ... 0.115s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.115s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.119s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.121s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.124s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.127s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.13s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.133s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.136s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.139s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.141s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.143s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.146s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.148s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.15s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.153s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.155s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.158s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.161s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.163s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.165s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.168s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.17s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.173s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.174s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.176s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.178s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.181s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.184s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.189s

#42 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.194s

#43 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.199s

#44 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.202s

#45 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.207s

#46 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.213s

#47 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.216s

#48 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.218s

#49 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.22s

#50 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.222s

#51 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.225s

#52 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.227s

#53 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.229s

#54 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.231s

#55 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.232s

#56 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.235s

#57 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.237s

#58 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.24s

#59 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.242s

#60 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.245s

#61 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.247s

#62 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.249s

#63 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.251s

#64 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.253s

#65 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.255s

#66 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.257s

#67 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.259s

#68 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.261s

#69 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.262s

#70 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.264s

#71 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.266s

#72 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.268s

#73 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.27s

#74 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.272s

#75 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.272s

#76 return log +0s ... 0.272s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)