UMI Z
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix
Pricecompare
Average of 10 scores (from 19 reviews)
Reviews for the UMI Z
Source: IT Pro Portal Archive.org version
It’s a toss between this one and the UMi Plus E. We’d still prefer the latter because of the storage capacity and RAM. Shame about the lack of NFC but at least it won’t cost you an arm and a leg.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: iTech Post Archive.org version
The UMI Z smartphone is a premium looking device that costs only $220-270. You will also be surprised as to how powerful this smartphone is. Interested? Read on.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/02/2017
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
The UMI Z is an excellent-value Android phone with a large battery, a decent screen, the most powerful MediaTek processor you can get and a very good selfie camera. Unfortunately the primary camera doesn't quite live up, but it's otherwise difficult to fault. With full UK 4G connectivity it's a great buy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 90%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 90% performance: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 50% workmanship: 90%
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 84% display: 82% mobility: 82%
Source: smart GSM ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 100% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: El chapuzas Informatico ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; nice performance; good display; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: Poor main camera; average autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2017
Source: 4G News PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent cameras; good built quality; low price; good hardware.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/13/2017
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 87% features: 85% display: 85% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 84%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 79% display: 78% mobility: 85% workmanship: 84%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High performance; great built quality; nice display. Negative: Slow fingerprint reader.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Source: Androidiani IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice performance; solid workmanship; good display. Negative: Inaccurate fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 56% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 30%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice performance; solid workmanship; good display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/09/2017
Source: Mobile Review RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice display; decent hardware. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/14/2017
Comment
ARM Mali-T880 MP4: Mobile graphics solution for tablets and smartphones, which can be found in ARM SoCs like the HiSilicon Kirin 950.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.50":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.76.8%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.