Samsung Q210

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the Samsung Q210

Samsung - NP Q210 review
Source: IT Reviews Archive.org version
Samsung's replacement for the popular Q45, the Q210 shows off Intel's new techology nicely and is a well equipped and performing notebook. And who knows, you just may get to like the 'touch of red'.
Ausstattung gut, Leistung gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/19/2008
Rating: performance: 80% features: 80%

80% Review: Samsung Q210 notebook PC
Source: vnunet.com Archive.org version
It won’t suit all tastes or gamers, but this Centrino 2 notebook has a good mix of CPU performance and battery life
(von 5): 4, Ausstattung 4, Leistung 4, Mobilität gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/29/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% features: 80% mobility: 80%

80% Samsung Q210
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Samsung Q210 is an impressive laptop that packs a host of features into its compact design. As a successor to the Q45, this is a logical progression that makes for a great laptop.
4 von 5, Mobilität sehr gut, Ausstattung sehr gut, Leistung gut, Display schlecht
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/26/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% features: 90% display: 40% mobility: 90%

78% Samsung Q210 review
Source: CNet Archive.org version
The Q210 is another solid laptop from Samsung. It improves on the Q70 in many ways, offers solid all-round performance and even has good battery life. Anyone in the market for a well-specced portable machine should definitely take a look.
7.8 von 10, Mobilität gut, Verarbeitung gut, Display schlecht
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/14/2008
Rating: Total score: 78% display: 40% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%

80% Samsung Q210 12.1in Centrino 2 Notebook
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
Despite some questionable design decisions, the Samsung Q210 continues Samsung's legacy of well balanced and affordable portable laptops thanks to excellent battery life and application performance at a price that won't break the bank.
(von 10): 8, Leistung 9, Ausstattung 8, Mobilität sehr gut
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% features: 80% mobility: 90%

Foreign Reviews

90% Samsung Q210-Aura P8600 Seven
Source: Notebookjournal DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2009
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 70% features: 50% display: 40% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 70%

80% Mobil und vielseitig
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 3-4/09
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80%

Test Samsung Q210 Aura Notebook
Source: Notebookcheck DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/19/2009
Rating: performance: 90% mobility: 80% emissions: 80%

79% Samsung Q210-Aura Terence
Source: PC Go - 12/08
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 90% performance: 80% mobility: 80%

80% Kompakt und aktuell
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 11-12/08
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80%

80% Samsung Q210-Aura P8400 Terence Subnotebook
Source: Minitechnet DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/21/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 80%

80% Samsung Q210-Aura Terence
Source: Magnus.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/16/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% mobility: 80%

Q210
Source: PC Praxis - 11/08
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/16/2008
Rating: display: 80%

81% Powerplayer
Source: Connect - 11/08
Comparison, , Long, Date: 10/16/2008
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 78% features: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 82%

49% Samsung Q210 Aura P8400 Terence
Source: PC Welt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/26/2008
Rating: Total score: 49% price: 100% performance: 92% features: 53% ergonomy: 44%

49% Samsung Q210 Aura P8400 Terence
Source: T-Online DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/26/2008
Rating: Total score: 49% price: 100% performance: 92% features: 53% mobility: 53% ergonomy: 44%

75% Samsung Q210-Aura P8400 Terence
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/08/2008
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 92% performance: 100% features: 82% display: 72% mobility: 57% workmanship: 50% ergonomy: 78%

70% Samsung Q210
Source: PCM NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/25/2008
Rating: Total score: 70% display: 50% mobility: 80%

70% Samsung Q210
Source: PCM NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/25/2008
Rating: Total score: 70% display: 40% mobility: 80%

Comment

NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS: Slower clocked 9300M GS and therefore a little bit slower. Supports PureVideo HD (VP3)and Hybrid-SLI (HybridPower and GeForceBoost).

Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).

The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.

P8400:

Middle class dual core CPU with a TDP of 25 Watt. For high end gamer the performance could be not sufficient (for class 1 graphic cards).

Devices with the same GPU

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight