Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 740 vs Qualcomm Adreno 720

Qualcomm Adreno 740

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 740

The Qualcomm Adreno 740 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SoC. The chip will be available starting early 2023 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. 

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno GPU offers a 25% improved performance compared to the Adreno 730 predecessor in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. First benchmarks show that the Adreno GPU can even beat the Apple A16 GPU (iPhone 14 Pro series) in synthetic benchmarks. Therefore, the Adreno 740 is the fastest graphics chip for smartphones in 2022.

The iGPU supports hardware accelerated ray tracing and a game post processing accelerator (for bloom, depth of field and motion blur). Another first, is the support for Vulkan 1.3.

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is produced in the modern 4nm process at TSMC.

Qualcomm Adreno 720

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 720

The Adreno 720 is a graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which was first used in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 was installed. The chip was introduced at the end of 2023 and is primarily used in Android-based upper mid-range devices.

HDR gaming with 10-bit color depth is possible with the graphics chip, and the Adreno 720 also supports the APIs OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP and Vulkan 1.3.

The GPU is capable of driving WFHD+ displays at up to 168 Hz and 4K displays at 60 Hz and offers support for HDR10+, HLG and Dolby Vision.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 740Qualcomm Adreno 720
Adreno 700 Series
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement16.11.2022 17.11.2024
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Adreno 740GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 28 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 720GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 38 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 12891     avg: 16704     median: 16773 (73%)     max: 18846 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 25211     avg: 33230     median: 34818 (77%)     max: 38087 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 10839     avg: 14512     median: 14892 (74%)     max: 16291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 18010     avg: 24205     median: 25076 (75%)     max: 26802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 9805     avg: 13955     median: 14017.5 (7%)     max: 14789 Points
5434 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3088     avg: 3648     median: 3701 (4%)     max: 3900 Points
1451 Points (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 18     avg: 29.1     median: 30 (12%)     max: 33 fps
11 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 24     avg: 59.9     median: 62 (11%)     max: 72 fps
23 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 82     avg: 144.6     median: 153 (11%)     max: 181 fps
57 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 67     avg: 119.2     median: 125 (14%)     max: 166 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 108     avg: 196.8     median: 209.5 (4%)     max: 226 fps
84 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 115     avg: 275.3     median: 283 (17%)     max: 346 fps
107 fps (6%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 740
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 301     avg: 453.3     median: 479 (4%)     max: 502 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 720
174 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 449271     avg: 554842     median: 570024 (71%)     max: 590837 Points
236226 Points (29%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 208.55     avg: 211     median: 210.4 (1%)     max: 214.17 fps
60.7 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 6548     avg: 8904     median: 8867 (3%)     max: 9784 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 3587     avg: 9009     median: 9402 (3%)     max: 10144 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
29649 Points (30%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
37697 Points (66%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.49     avg: 9.6     median: 9.7 (4%)     max: 14.5 Watt
5.2 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 740 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 720 → 37% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 740:
58.5  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 740:
59 59.2 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
84%
Adreno 720:
50.1  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 740:
59 60 60 60 60 61 63 117 119 120 ~ 78 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 87.8 89 90 90 ~ 71 fps
81%
Adreno 720:
57.7  fps
med.
100%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Adreno 740:
59 59.3 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
96%
Adreno 720:
57.5  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 740:
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
97%
Adreno 720:
38.7  fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
100%
Adreno 740:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 740:
116  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 740:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 740:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 740:
120  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 740 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 720 → 89%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 89%

Qualcomm Adreno 740lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal6060
Genshin Impact58.560
Armajet78
PUBG Mobile71606040
World of Tanks Blitz60
Dead Trigger 2116
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
Subway Surfers120
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
3


1


5
1
1
2






Qualcomm Adreno 720lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact50.1
PUBG Mobile57.757.538.7
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1





1


2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 23. 05:11:44

#0 checking url part for id 11440 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12490 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:38:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.142s ... 0.143s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.143s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.143s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11440 +0.047s ... 0.19s

#8 got single benchmarks 11440 +0.091s ... 0.281s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12490 +0.002s ... 0.283s

#10 got single benchmarks 12490 +0.01s ... 0.293s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.293s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.107s ... 0.401s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.401s

#14 Got 101 rows for game benchmarks. +0.093s ... 0.493s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.493s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.498s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.022s ... 0.52s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.52s

#19 return log +0.084s ... 0.604s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)