Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom Z560 vs Intel Atom 230 vs Intel Atom Z550

Intel Atom Z560

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom Z560 is a relatively high clocked Atom processor of the power efficient Z-series. It is specified at a much lower TDP than the similar N-series and offers hardware virtualization (VT-x). Due to the in-order execution, the performance per clock-rate is not as good as Celeron or Core 2 Duo processors. The missing Intel 64 Instructions wont allow a user to install a 64 Bit operating system on the Z550.

Intel Atom 230

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom 230 is a small and cheap CPU for small desktops (Nettops). It is similar to the Atom N270, but lacks Speedstep and features a higher TDP.

Due to the "in-order" Architecture of the Atom series, the 230 is slower than similar clocked Core 2 Duo processors and only suited for low demanding tasks. The Atom 230 support Hyperthreading.

Intel Atom Z550

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom Z550 is a power saving netbook / MID single-core processor. Compared to the Atom N-series, the Z-series supports Virtualization in hardware and got the Idle States and Demand Based Switching functions. Therefore, the Z-Series also has a lower TDP rating.

The Atom core was designed for a low power consumption and cheap production. The downside is the relative low performance per Watt (due to the in-order execution) compared to similar clocked Celeron processors, e.g.. Still the integrated Hyper-Threading (the operating system sees the CPU as a dual core CPU) decreases the penalty of the in-order execution a bit.

ModelIntel Atom Z560Intel Atom 230Intel Atom Z550
SeriesIntel AtomIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenameSilverthorneSilverthorneSilverthorne
Series: Atom Silverthorne
» Intel Atom Z5602.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5502 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5000.8 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5602.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5502 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5000.8 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5602.13 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom Z5502 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5000.8 GHz1 / 1
Clock2130 MHz1600 MHz2000 MHz
FSB533533533
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 21 / 21 / 2
TDP2.5 Watt4 Watt2.4 Watt
Transistors47 Million47 Million47 Million
Technology45 nm0.75-1.1V45 nm0.9-1.162V45 nm
Die Size26 mm226 mm226 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C85.2 °C
SocketPBGA441PBGA437PBGA441
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHT, HyperthreadingMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T, HHTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHT, Hyperthreading
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Atom Z560Intel Atom 230Intel Atom Z550

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 230 +
557 Points (5%)
118%
1 Z550 +
657 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 230 +
851 Points (1%)
115%
1 Z550 +
980 Points (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z550 +
3625 s (43%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z550 +
101.5 s (20%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 230 +
5606 s (22%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 230 +
173 s (91%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 230 +
93 s (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z550 +
182 s (8%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 230 +
3616 s (16%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 230 +
1718 Points (11%)
88%
1 Z550 +
1506 Points (9%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 Z550 +
2.7 Points (39%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 Z550 +
2.7 Points (35%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom 230 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z550 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 04. 05:32:16

#0 checking url part for id 892 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 463 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 522 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#22 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 892 +0s ... 0.006s

#24 got single benchmarks 892 +0s ... 0.006s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 463 +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 got single benchmarks 463 +0.006s ... 0.013s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 522 +0s ... 0.013s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#30 got single benchmarks 522 +0.007s ... 0.02s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.021s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.023s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#47 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.026s

#48 return log +0s ... 0.026s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)