Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom Z540 vs Intel Atom 230

Intel Atom Z540

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom Z540 is a power saving netbook / MID single-core processor. Compared to the Atom N270, the Z540 supports Virtualization in hardware and got the Idle States and Demand Based Switching power saving functions. Futhermore, the Z540 is higher clocked but in contrary specified at a lower TDP rating.

The Atom core was designed for a low power consumption and cheap production. The downside is the relative low performance per Watt (due to the in-order execution) compared to similar clocked Celeron processors, e.g.. Still the integrated Hyper-Threading (the operating system sees the CPU as a dual core CPU) decreases the penalty of the in-order execution a bit.

The performance of the Z540 is only compareable to a 1.3 GHz clocked Celeron M and therfore only sufficient for non demanding applications like Office or web surfing. HD videos, advanced photo editing, video cutting may not run fluently. 

Intel Atom 230

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom 230 is a small and cheap CPU for small desktops (Nettops). It is similar to the Atom N270, but lacks Speedstep and features a higher TDP.

Due to the "in-order" Architecture of the Atom series, the 230 is slower than similar clocked Core 2 Duo processors and only suited for low demanding tasks. The Atom 230 support Hyperthreading.

ModelIntel Atom Z540Intel Atom 230
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenameSilverthorneSilverthorne
Series: Atom Silverthorne
Intel Atom Z560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z550 compare2 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z530 compare1.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z520 compare1.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z510 compare1.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z500 compare0.8 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z550 compare2 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z530 compare1.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z520 compare1.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z510 compare1.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z500 compare0.8 GHz1 / 1
Clock1830 MHz1600 MHz
FSB533533
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 21 / 2
TDP2 Watt4 Watt
Transistors47 Million47 Million
45 nm0.75-1.1V45 nm0.9-1.162V
Die Size26 mm226 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C85.2 °C
SocketPBGA441PBGA437
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHT, VT-x, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Demand Based Switching, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T, HHT
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Atom Z540Intel Atom 230

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
Z540 +
min: 563     avg: 568     median: 568 (5%)     max: 573 Points
98%
230 +
557 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
Z540 +
min: 622     avg: 778     median: 778 (1%)     max: 934 Points
109%
230 +
851 Points (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z540 +
3359 s (40%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z540 +
min: 105     avg: 105.4     median: 105.4 (21%)     max: 105.8 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 230 +
5606 s (22%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 230 +
173 s (91%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 Z540 +
369 Points (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
Z540 +
min: 85.3     avg: 85.7     median: 85.7 (18%)     max: 86 s
98%
230 +
93 s (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z540 +
min: 185     avg: 186.6     median: 186.6 (8%)     max: 188.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
Z540 +
4192 s (19%)
103%
230 +
3616 s (16%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 Z540 +
min: 4600     avg: 4650     median: 4650 (2%)     max: 4700 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 Z540 +
min: 3936     avg: 3968     median: 3968 (3%)     max: 4000 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
Z540 +
1547 Points (10%)
111%
230 +
1718 Points (11%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 Z540 +
min: 1.9     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (29%)     max: 2.7 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z540 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom 230 → 104% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 30. 06:13:21

#0 checking url part for id 458 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 463 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 458 +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 got single benchmarks 458 +0.009s ... 0.014s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 463 +0s ... 0.014s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#21 got single benchmarks 463 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#49 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.026s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#51 return log +0.004s ... 0.03s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)