Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Atom Z510 vs Intel Atom Z520

Intel Atom Z510

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom Z510 is a single core CPU for small MIDs, netbooks, internet devices. The performance is very low and therefore only some applications with low CPU demand may run fluently (e.g., email, simple word processing). The Z510 does not support HyperThreading and 64 Bit instructions.

Intel Atom Z520

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom Z520 is a power saving netbook / MID single-core processor. Compared to the Atom N-series, the Z-series supports Virtualization in hardware and got the Idle States and Demand Based Switching functions.

The Atom core was designed for a low power consumption and cheap production. The downside is the relative low performance per Watt (due to the in-order execution) compared to similar clocked Celeron processors, e.g.. Still the integrated Hyper-Threading (the operating system sees the CPU as a dual core CPU) decreases the penalty of the in-order execution a bit.

The performance of the Z520 is only compareable to a 800-900 MHz clocked Celeron M and therfore only sufficient for non demanding applications like Office or web surfing. HD videos, advanced photo editing, video cutting may not run fluently. 

ModelIntel Atom Z510Intel Atom Z520
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenameSilverthorneSilverthorne
Series: Atom Silverthorne
Intel Atom Z560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z550 compare2 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z540 compare1.83 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom 230 compare1.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z530 compare1.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z500 compare0.8 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z550 compare2 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z540 compare1.83 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom 230 compare1.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z530 compare1.6 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z500 compare0.8 GHz1 / 1
Clock1100 MHz1333 MHz
FSB400533
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 2
TDP2 Watt2 Watt
Transistors47 Million47 Million
45 nm0.75-1.145 nm0.75-1.1V
Die Size26 mm226 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
SocketPBGA441PBGA441
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHT
Architecturex86x86
$20 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Atom Z510Intel Atom Z520

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 424     avg: 443     median: 449 (4%)     max: 454 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 635     avg: 706     median: 689.5 (1%)     max: 869 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 4528     avg: 4595     median: 4594.5 (54%)     max: 4661 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 141     avg: 145.8     median: 146.3 (29%)     max: 150.2 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 Z520 +
391 Points (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
Z510 +
147 s (32%)
110%
Z520 +
min: 113     avg: 121.7     median: 115 (25%)     max: 137 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 251     avg: 258     median: 258 (11%)     max: 265 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 5602     avg: 6153     median: 6153 (27%)     max: 6704 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 3125     avg: 3279     median: 3353 (2%)     max: 3360 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 2608     avg: 2738     median: 2797 (2%)     max: 2808 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 692     avg: 949     median: 1002 (6%)     max: 1099 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 Z520 +
2.7 Points (39%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
2.1 Points (27%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z510 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z520 → 110% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 17. 23:39:17

#0 checking url part for id 464 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 462 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 May 2022 13:12:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 464 +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 got single benchmarks 464 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 462 +0s ... 0.011s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.011s

#21 got single benchmarks 462 +0.013s ... 0.025s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.026s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.03s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#59 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#60 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.03s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#62 return log +0.003s ... 0.034s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)