, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Atom Z510 vs Intel Atom Z520 vs Intel Atom Z530

Intel Atom Z510

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom Z510 is a single core CPU for small MIDs, netbooks, internet devices. The performance is very low and therefore only some applications with low CPU demand may run fluently (e.g., email, simple word processing). The Z510 does not support HyperThreading and 64 Bit instructions.

Intel Atom Z520

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom Z520 is a power saving netbook / MID single-core processor. Compared to the Atom N-series, the Z-series supports Virtualization in hardware and got the Idle States and Demand Based Switching functions.

The Atom core was designed for a low power consumption and cheap production. The downside is the relative low performance per Watt (due to the in-order execution) compared to similar clocked Celeron processors, e.g.. Still the integrated Hyper-Threading (the operating system sees the CPU as a dual core CPU) decreases the penalty of the in-order execution a bit.

The performance of the Z520 is only compareable to a 800-900 MHz clocked Celeron M and therfore only sufficient for non demanding applications like Office or web surfing. HD videos, advanced photo editing, video cutting may not run fluently. 

Intel Atom Z530

► remove from comparison Intel Z530

The Intel Atom Z530 is a power saving netbook / MID single-core processor. Compared to the Atom N270, the Z530 supports Virtualization in hardware and got the Idle States and Demand Based Switching functions.

The Atom core was designed for a low power consumption and cheap production. The downside is the relative low performance per Watt (due to the in-order execution) compared to similar clocked Celeron processors, e.g.. Still the integrated Hyper-Threading (the operating system sees the CPU as a dual core CPU) decreases the penalty of the in-order execution a bit.

The performance of the Z530 is only compareable to a 1.2 GHz clocked Celeron M and therfore only sufficient for non demanding applications like Office or web surfing. HD videos, advanced photo editing, video cutting may not run fluently. 

Intel Atom Z510Intel Atom Z520Intel Atom Z530
Intel AtomIntel AtomIntel Atom
SilverthorneSilverthorneSilverthorne
Series: Atom Silverthorne
Intel Atom Z5602.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5502 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5000.8 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5602.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5502 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5301.6 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5000.8 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5602.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5502 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom Z5301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5000.8 GHz1 / 1
1100 MHz1333 MHz1600 MHz
400533533
512 KB512 KB512 KB
1 / 11 / 21 / 2
2 2 2
47 47 47
45 0.75-1.145 0.75-1.1V45 0.75-1.1V
26 mm226 mm226 mm2
90 °C90 °C90 °C
PBGA441PBGA441PBGA441
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Hyperthreading, Virtualization Technology (VT-x), Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Demand Based Switching, Ex Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
$20 U.S.
Intel Atom Z510Intel Atom Z520Intel Atom Z530

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 424     avg: 443     median: 449 (4%)     max: 454
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 635     avg: 706     median: 689.5 (1%)     max: 869
119%
1 Z530 +
min: 805     avg: 817     median: 817.5 (1%)     max: 827
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 4528.41     avg: 4595     median: 4594.7 (54%)     max: 4660.92 s
117%
1 Z530 +
min: 3887.19     avg: 3995     median: 3928.1 (46%)     max: 4170 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 141     avg: 146     median: 146.3 (29%)     max: 150.184 s
107%
1 Z530 +
min: 121.796     avg: 126     median: 123 (25%)     max: 133 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 Z520 +
391 Points (2%)
117%
1 Z530 +
min: 440     avg: 459     median: 458.5 (3%)     max: 477 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
Z510 +
147 s (32%)
110%
Z520 +
min: 113     avg: 122     median: 115 (25%)     max: 137 s
116%
Z530 +
min: 93     avg: 99.3     median: 98 (21%)     max: 108 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 251     avg: 258     median: 258 (11%)     max: 265 s
102%
1 Z530 +
min: 209     avg: 218     median: 218 (9%)     max: 226 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 5602     avg: 6153     median: 6153 (27%)     max: 6704 s
108%
1 Z530 +
min: 4671     avg: 4751     median: 4777 (21%)     max: 4804 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 3125     avg: 3279     median: 3353 (2%)     max: 3360 MIPS
119%
1 Z530 +
min: 3953     avg: 3994     median: 3994 (2%)     max: 4035 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 2608     avg: 2738     median: 2797 (2%)     max: 2808 MFLOPS
119%
1 Z530 +
min: 3302     avg: 3334     median: 3334 (3%)     max: 3366 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 692     avg: 949     median: 1002 (6%)     max: 1099 Points
102%
1 Z530 +
min: 820     avg: 1019     median: 1018.5 (6%)     max: 1217 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 Z520 +
2.7 Points (39%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
2.1 Points (27%)
100%
1 Z530 +
2.2 Points (28%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z510 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z520 → 110% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z530 → 116% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.16
log 22. 08:56:35

#0 checking url part for id 464 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 462 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 388 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 464 +0s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 464 +0.006s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 462 +0s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 462 +0.013s ... 0.026s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 388 +0s ... 0.027s

#12 got single benchmarks 388 +0.013s ... 0.039s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.049s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.049s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.049s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)