, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Atom Z3795 vs Intel Atom Z3680

Intel Atom Z3795

► remove from comparison Intel Z3795

The Intel Atom Z3795 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.59 - 2.39 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. Compared to the Z3775, the Z3795 offers a slightly higher CPU base clock.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of 1.59 - 2.39 GHz, the Z3795 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. The Z3795 even beats some of the Kabini APUs like the AMD A4-5000, as well as ARM SoCs like Tegra 4 and the Snapdragon 800. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 778 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and comparable to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 (as found in the Snapdragon 600). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3680

► remove from comparison Intel Z3680

The Intel Atom Z3680 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.33 - 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Z3680 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. Presumably, the Z3680 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 667 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 1280 x 800 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC should be rated at an SDP of about 2 watts, which would indicate a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3795Intel Atom Z3680
Intel AtomIntel Atom
Bay Trail-TBay Trail-T
Series: Atom Bay Trail-T
» Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770 compare1.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770 compare1.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
1590 - 2390 MHz1330 - 2000 MHz
224 KB112 KB
2 MB1 MB
4 / 42 / 2
<4 <4
22 22
UTFCBGA1380
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 778 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 667 MHz), Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, max. 1 GB Single-Channel LPDDR3-1067, Quick Sync
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 778 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 667 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$40 U.S.
Intel Atom Z3795

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 118     avg: 128     median: 131 (3%)     max: 134 Points
0102030405060708090100110116.3373.1382.1493.5294.0392.791.6888.3485.1981.383.3186.8387.0786.9987.8887.8987.4787.0487.9487.187.489.3788.5787.3187.9289.189.6588.7589.0589.1689.2789.2589.0589.17Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 36     avg: 37     median: 37 (14%)     max: 38 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 1.61     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3795 +
0.4 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 1220     avg: 1394     median: 1234 (11%)     max: 1727
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 3324     avg: 3715     median: 3715 (6%)     max: 4106
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 1727     avg: 4390     median: 5683 (5%)     max: 5761 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 1727     avg: 2951     median: 1732 (12%)     max: 5393 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z3795 +
1020 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 25.928     avg: 27.2     median: 27.2 (5%)     max: 28.4 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 Z3795 +
1075 (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 7.12     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (4%)     max: 9.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 37.15     avg: 42.1     median: 42.1 (12%)     max: 47.13 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 0.124     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (5%)     max: 0.125 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 0.193     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (5%)     max: 0.195 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 0.885     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (3%)     max: 0.891 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 2069     avg: 2146     median: 2145.5 (12%)     max: 2222 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 36.265     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (8%)     max: 37 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 79.598     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (3%)     max: 81 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 1732     avg: 1735     median: 1734.6 (8%)     max: 1737.23 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 Z3795 +
24.2 MIPS (0%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 Z3795 +
12.2 MFLOPS (0%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 Z3795 +
3552 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 1141     avg: 1386     median: 1301 (5%)     max: 1799 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 Z3795 +
18838 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z3795 +
20794 Points (22%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 Z3795 +
8367 ms (14%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 Z3795 +
388 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 Z3795 +
3353 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3795 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 24. 04:37:00

#0 checking url part for id 5968 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4579 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:08:13 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.016s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.016s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5968 +0s ... 0.017s

#7 got single benchmarks 5968 +0.01s ... 0.027s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4579 +0s ... 0.028s

#9 got single benchmarks 4579 +0s ... 0.028s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.045s

#12 return log +0.003s ... 0.048s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)