Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 940 vs Qualcomm Adreno 750

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

Qualcomm Adreno 750

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 750 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 8 Gen. 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (System-on-a-Chip) was introduced in October 2023 and can be found in many Android-based high-end products of the year 2024. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 25% over its predecessor, the Adreno 740, as well as a 25 % improvement in efficiency. The Adreno 750 can now additionally adjust frame rates to within 1 Hz (QSnyc), which should improve power consumption once again. 

With Snapdragon Elite Gaming, games are now possible at up to 240 FPS and the Adreno Frame Motion Engine 2.0 is now said to be able to accelerate games that are limited to 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Upscaling for games in 8k should also be possible. 

The Adreno 750 supports all common Android APIs and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 Lumens. 

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at TSMC.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 750
Adreno 700 Series
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 compare 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 25.10.2023
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 750GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy8 x 2300 MHz? MHz1000 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 38 x 2300 MHz? MHz903 MHz
min. - max.? MHz903 - 1000 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
min: 13910     avg: 20925     median: 22040 (96%)     max: 23024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
min: 38076     avg: 43953     median: 44758 (98%)     max: 45492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
min: 9984     avg: 16072     median: 17279 (73%)     max: 20131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
min: 22388     avg: 29111     median: 29081 (72%)     max: 33376 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
17553 Points (86%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
29890 Points (100%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12652     avg: 13199     median: 13098 (7%)     max: 13847 Points
min: 15108     avg: 18672     median: 19022 (10%)     max: 20321 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3933     avg: 4182     median: 4235 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
min: 3991     avg: 4744     median: 4739 (5%)     max: 5190 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32     median: 32 (12%)     max: 34 fps
min: 27     avg: 36.2     median: 37 (14%)     max: 42 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 69     avg: 77.7     median: 75 (13%)     max: 89 fps
min: 43     avg: 75.3     median: 76.5 (14%)     max: 96 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 153     avg: 161     median: 154 (11%)     max: 176 fps
min: 92     avg: 186.5     median: 189 (14%)     max: 241 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 130     avg: 133.3     median: 131 (12%)     max: 139 fps
min: 64     avg: 139.3     median: 144.5 (14%)     max: 162 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 214     avg: 224.3     median: 215 (5%)     max: 244 fps
min: 90     avg: 236.8     median: 248 (5%)     max: 279 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 269     avg: 289.3     median: 289 (12%)     max: 310 fps
min: 143     avg: 312.3     median: 325 (14%)     max: 387 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 378     avg: 388.3     median: 384 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 750
min: 189     avg: 482.2     median: 503 (4%)     max: 549 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 676800     avg: 747103     median: 754580 (75%)     max: 784286 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 637825     median: 617384 (49%)     max: 682510 Points
min: 537309     avg: 774559     median: 774427 (62%)     max: 927463 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
min: 212.26     avg: 248.6     median: 248.6 (6%)     max: 285 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 16906     avg: 16942     median: 16932 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
min: 10798     avg: 14096     median: 14130 (4%)     max: 16784 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16059     median: 16078 (4%)     max: 16087 Points
min: 13579     avg: 15776     median: 16202 (4%)     max: 17531 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.2     avg: 11.5     median: 11 (4%)     max: 13.2 Watt
min: 3.24     avg: 9.1     median: 8.9 (3%)     max: 15.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 115% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 750:
59.3 59.6 59.8 ~ 60 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
58 59 60 ~ 59 fps
90%
Adreno 750:
40 52 60 60.1 ~ 53 fps
med.
Adreno 750:
59.8  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
47 58 59 ~ 55 fps
104%
Adreno 750:
51 52 54 55 59.8 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
81 90 90 ~ 87 fps
101%
Adreno 750:
49 58 59.3 59.4 60 89 90 90 115.3 116.2 118 119 120 ~ 88 fps
med.
Adreno 750:
60  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
57 60 60 ~ 59 fps
98%
Adreno 750:
40 58.1 59 59.3 59.5 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 750:
39.4 39.6 39.9 39.9 39.9 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps
70%
Adreno 750:
60 60 98 103 ~ 80 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Adreno 750:
59.4  fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 94%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 98%

Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 750
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal60
Genshin Impact59555359.857
PUBG Mobile87594088605840
Dead Trigger 211480
Asphalt 9: Legends59.4
Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 750
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2

1
1

2
1

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 07. 08:52:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11624 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751871119s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 07 Jul 2025 05:22:05 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.012s ... 0.041s

#9 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.005s ... 0.046s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11624 +0s ... 0.047s

#11 got single benchmarks 11624 +0.025s ... 0.072s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.077s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.077s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.089s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.089s

#17 Got 82 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.105s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.105s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.105s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.107s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.107s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.107s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)