The best alternatives for the Samsung Galaxy J5
For the original German review, see here.
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016, SM-J510FN) was announced with a recommended retail price of 279 Euros (~$298), but the price dropped below 220 Euros (~$235) by now, which is good news for potential customers. However, the competition offers very interesting rivals for the market leader Samsung as well.
We had a closer look at four smartphones: Huawei P9 Lite, Honor 5C, Sony Xperia XA, and ZTE Blade V7 offer great overall packages as well, but the Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016) is also an interesting alternative for the Galaxy J5 when you can live with the smaller screen. But is it also the better smartphone, and which smartphone is the best choice for you? We will try to find out in this comparison.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
Details here
Specs | Galaxy J5 (2016) | Honor 5C | Huawei P9 Lite | Xperia XA | ZTE Blade V7 | Galaxy A3 (2016) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5.2“, OLED, 720p | 5.2“, IPS, 1080p | 5.2“, IPS, 1080p | 5.0“, IPS, 720p | 5.2“, IPS, 1080p | 4.7“, OLED, 720p |
SoC | Snapdragon 410 | Kirin 650 | Kirin 650 | Helio P10 | MT6753 | Exynos 7578 |
RAM | 2 GB | 2 GB | 3 GB | 2 GB | 2 GB | 1.5 GB |
Flash storage | 16 GB | 16 GB | 16 GB | 16 GB | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Dual-SIM | yes | yes | hybrid | no | hybrid | no |
MicroSD | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Fingerprint | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
Cameras | 13 / 5 MP | 13 / 8 MP | 13 / 8 MP | 13 / 8 MP | 13 / 5 MP | 13 / 5 MP |
Battery | 3100 mAh | 3000 mAh | 3000 mAh | 2300 mAh | 2540 mAh | 2300 mAh |
Case
Samsung improved the case of the Galaxy J5 compared to the previous generation and equips the current model with a metal frame. This is also the case for many rivals, only the Honor 5C and the ZTE Blade V7 feature full aluminum cases.
The Galaxy A3 has the smallest screen size in this comparison – the screen of the Galaxy J5 is 0.5 inches larger – so it is also the lightest model in this comparison group at just 131 grams (~4.6 oz). The Xperia XA is only slightly heavier at 137 grams (~4.8 oz), despite the large display.
Most smartphones have an integrated battery by now, and the Galaxy J5 definitely has an advantage here since it is the only device with an accessible battery. You can also get a Duos version of the smartphone with dual-SIM support as well as the storage extension via microSD. All rivals support microSD-cards, but only the Honor 5C actually has three card slots. The other models either use a hybrid solution or waive the dual-SIM functionality completely.
This means the Galaxy J5 comes out ahead in terms of maintainability.
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Display, Connectivity and Performance
Contrary to its rivals, the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is equipped with a Super AMOLED screen. It features the HD resolution and produces more vibrant colors as well as rich blacks. The luminance is also very good at up to 550 nits. No other smartphone in this comparison can compete with this result. However, there is one significant drawback: It does not have an ambient light sensor, which can adjust the luminance of the panel automatically. This is basically a no-go when you consider the original price of the device. Even smartphones for around 120 Euros (~$128) are usually equipped with this feature. Another drawback is the PWM control of the panel luminance, which sets in at 50% of the brightness or less. This can quickly result in tired eyes or even headaches for sensitive users. All the rivals use IPS displays without PWM and both the Honor 5C and the Huawei P9 Lite feature the much higher Full HD resolution compared to the Galaxy J5. The other areas like color accuracy, brightness distribution and contrast ratio usually favor the Galaxy J5, only Samsung's Galaxy A3 is sometimes even better.
However, the Samsung Galaxy J5 leaves a rather weak impression in terms of performance. It is the slowest device here in the system benchmark AnTuTu and the Galaxy J5 cannot keep up with the rivals in terms of CPU or GPU performance, either. The Snapdragon 410 is just too outdated. Devices with the modern mainstream SoC Kirin 650 in particular manage good scores across the board. At least the microSD-card reader of the Galaxy J5 is very fast.
The remaining specifications of all comparison devices are quite similar: LTE, Wi-Fi-Direct and OTG are supported. The Xperia XA is the only smartphone that supports fast 5.0 GHz WLAN networks. You are limited to devices from Honor or Huawei if you want a fingerprint scanner. The main cameras of all models have a 13 MP sensor, only the front cameras differ. Sony, Honor, and Huawei use higher resolution sensors with 8 MP. All in all, the cameras are on a similar level, but the components from ZTE, Honor, and Huawei are slightly superior in our opinion.
All smartphones are currently shipped with the quite modern operating system Google Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Updates for the new version Android 7.0 Nougat are already announced for the Sony Xperia XA, Honor 5C and the Huawei P9 Lite. Samsung already confirmed an update to version 7 for the Galaxy A3 (2016), but this does not seem to be the case for the J-models with Qualcomm SoCs since the chip manufacturer apparently does not want to create new drivers.
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.20 | Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5.00 | Huawei P9 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Honor 5C IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | ZTE Blade V7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.70 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | ||||||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 20 ? | 26 ? | 40 ? | 28.4 ? | 43 ? | 7 ? |
Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 22 ? | 32 ? | 23 ? | 27 ? | 9 ? |
PWM Frequency | 243.9 | 240.4 | ||||
Screen | ||||||
Brightness middle | 289 | 518 | 505 | 515 | 409 | 386 |
Brightness | 291 | 475 | 468 | 498 | 411 | 394 |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 81 | 88 | 93 | 96 | 88 |
Black Level * | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.49 | 0.38 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 6.8 | 4.1 | 6.2 | 9.4 | 1.11 |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.3 | 11.4 | 5.8 | 11.4 | 17.6 | 3.35 |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 7 | 4.9 | 7.4 | 11.6 | 1.34 |
Gamma | 2.03 108% | 2.35 94% | 2.5 88% | 2.28 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.12 104% |
CCT | 6291 103% | 8151 80% | 7116 91% | 8664 75% | 9597 68% | 6441 101% |
Contrast | 849 | 682 | 1051 | 1076 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark for Android - Work performance score | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5C | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
ZTE Blade V7 |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
Honor 5C | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5C | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
Honor 5C | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5C | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Honor 5C | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5C | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5C | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
ZTE Blade V7 |
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5C | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
Sequential Write 256KB | |
Honor 5C | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5C | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
Honor 5C | |
ZTE Blade V7 |
Battery Runtime
Every smartphone should have a lot of stamina, and this is actually one area where the Samsung Galaxy J5 comes out ahead and is only beaten by other Samsung devices. However, the J5 also has the largest battery capacity in this comparison group. Similar batteries are used for smartphones like the P9 Lite and Honor 5C, but they have higher display resolutions and therefore slightly shorter battery runtimes.
The Xperia XA falls behind here due to its comparatively small battery, even though the Blade V7 shows that a small battery does not necessarily have to result in short runtimes.
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh | Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 2300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||||
Reader / Idle | 1599 | 1404 | 775 | 997 | 1978 | |
H.264 | 658 | 568 | 460 | 602 | 863 | |
WiFi v1.3 | 643 | 604 | 353 | 584 | 519 | 628 |
Load | 402 | 272 | 170 | 156 | 376 |
Verdict
Our comparison shows that there are definitely alternatives for the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016), but there is no perfect competitor for the popular smartphone from Korea. It is actually the only device with a replaceable battery in this comparison group. This is pretty rare nowadays, even though it is still important for many customers because you can just replace an aging part, which improves the longevity in return. However, this argument is countered by the software. Android 6.0 Marshmallow is currently still quite modern, but an update to a newer version is uncertain for the Galaxy J5.
This is not the case for the rivals from Sony, Honor, and Huawei, where an update to Android 7.0 Nougat was already announced. The Honor 5C and the P9 Lite are also more future-proof thanks to their faster SoCs and higher display resolutions. The battery runtimes once again favor the Galaxy J5, and it is only beaten by the Galaxy A3 (2016). However, the latter is only an alternative when you can live with a smaller display.
Only the Galaxy J5 offers a replaceable battery and three card slots. A look at the comparison is still a good idea when you want modern hardware and a future-proof device.
The Galaxy J5 could also be improved in terms of comfort and system performance. The missing ambient light sensor in particular can be a real annoyance in changing lighting situations. Both the 5C and the P9 Lite are also equipped with a fingerprint scanner for faster access and additional convenience.