Notebookcheck Logo

Google Tensor G3 vs Qualcomm QCM6490 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G

Google Tensor G3

► remove from comparison Google Tensor G3

The Tensor G3 marks the third generation of Google's own chipsets for smartphones and tablets based on Android. This SoC is used for the first time in the Pixel 8 and Pixel 8 Pro and Google sees the SoC as a high-end device.

The CPU of the Tensor G3 is composed of three clusters. The first houses a single powerful Cortex-X3 core, which can operate at up to 2.91 GHz, the second offers four performance cores (Cortex-A715) with up to 2.37 GHz and the third cluster has four efficiency cores (Cortex-A510) with up to 1.7 GHz. The clock speeds are therefore not particularly high, so that the pure CPU performance is more on the level of an upper-middle-class SoC. 

An ARM Mali-G715 is used as the graphics unit. Google is silent about the exact number of cores, but the benchmarks and the lack of ray tracing suggest a version with seven cores (G715MP7). 

The core of the Tensor SoCs is the Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), which is responsible for AI and ML tasks. Here, too, Google owes the public more precise information and only talks about the fact that 150 times more complex AI models can be calculated on the device. 

In addition, Google integrates its isolated security core subsystem, which again uses the Titan M2 co-processor and provides additional protection for its own data on a hardware basis. The G5300i modem is based on the Exynos 5300 and supports Wi-Fi 7.

The Tensor G3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at Samsung.

Qualcomm QCM6490

► remove from comparison Qualcomm QCM6490

The Qualcomm QCM6490 is an upper mid-range SoC and is based on the Snapdragon 778G, but this variant is an extended-life chipset. The QCM6490 is being used for the first time in the Android smartphone Fairphone 5, but has actually been designed for corporate use and IoT applications.

The Kyro 670 CPU consists of a total of eight cores, which are divided into three clusters. The first cluster consists of just one high-performance core (Kyro Gold Plus, Cortex-A78), which operates at up to 2.71 GHz. The second cluster contains three further Cortex-A78 cores (Kyro Gold), each clocking at up to 2.40 GHz. The remaining four power-saving cores (Kyro Silver, Cortex-A55) are located in the last cluster and operate at up to 1.96 GHz. For the graphics calculations, an Adreno 643 with 812 MHz is integrated.

The QCM6490 SoC has an integrated 5G modem that supports both 5G-Sub6 and 5G-mmWave. In theory, this enables data rates of up to 3.7 Gbit/s downlink and 2.5 Gbit/s upload. Wi-Fi 6E is also on board, which supports the 6 GHz band.

The SoC is manufactured using the 6 nm process.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 778G+ 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (SDM778G Plus 5G Mobile Platform) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It integrates eight cores (octa-core) divided into two clusters. A fast performance cluster with four cores based on the ARM Cortex-A78 architecture with up to 2.5 GHz and a power efficiency cluster with four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.9 GHz. Depending on the workload only single clusters or all cores can run at different clock speeds. Compared to the older non-plus variant, the 778G+ offers 100 MHz higher clocked CPU cores.

Thanks to the new Cortex-A78 cores, the CPU performance increases by up to 40% compared to the old Snapdragon 768G according to Qualcomm. In our benchmarks, the 778G+ is able to reach the performance of the old high end chip Kirin 990

The integrated X53 5G modem supports up to 3.3 Gbps with sub 6Ghz. The FastConnect 6900 Wi-Fi modem supports the current Wi-Fi 6e standard with 6GHz.

The integrated Qualcomm Adreno 642L offers a 40% higher performance compared to the old Adreno 620 in the predecessor. This is partly thanks to the fast memory controller with LPDDR5-3200 support.

The integrated 6th gen AI engine called Hexagon 770 offers a 2x improvement and up to 12 TOPS of performance. The Spectra 570 ISP (image signal processor) supports up to three cameras. The satellite system supports all major standards like Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS and GPS.

The G specifies an optimized SoC for gaming and e.g. Qualcomm offers updates for the graphics driver.

The Snapdragon 778G Plus is manufactured in the modern 6 nm process at TSMC (vs the 5LPE of the 780G).

ModelGoogle Tensor G3Qualcomm QCM6490Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
SeriesGoogle Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameZuma - Cortex X3 / A715 / A510Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Clock1700 - 2910 MHz1960 - 2710 MHz1900 - 2500 MHz
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads9 / 9
1 x 2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-X3
4 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A715
4 x 1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
8 / 88 / 8
Technology4 nm6 nm6 nm
FeaturesWi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.3, LPDDR5x-RAM, Dual-Band GNSS, Titan M2Dual-Band GNSS, AI Engine (Gen. 6), Hexagon 770, Sensing Hub (Gen. 2), FastConnect 6900, Bluetooth 5.2, Spectra 570L ISP; LPDDR5 (3200 MHz) / LPDDR4x (2133 MHz)Adreno 642L GPU, X53 5G Modem, Hexagon 770 DSP, Spectra 570L ISP, Wi-Fi 6E
iGPUARM Mali-G715 MP7Qualcomm Adreno 643 (812 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 642L
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerstore.google.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G1.9 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm QCM6490 « 1.96 - 2.71 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G1.9 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G1.9 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm QCM64901.96 - 2.71 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G « 1.9 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4995     avg: 5020     median: 5019.5 (59%)     max: 5044 Points
4960 Points (58%)
min: 4518     avg: 4659     median: 4547 (54%)     max: 4912 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4994     avg: 5068     median: 5067.5 (58%)     max: 5141 Points
4732 Points (54%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1653     avg: 1711     median: 1711 (46%)     max: 1769 Points
1129 Points (30%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 4225     avg: 4382     median: 4381.5 (17%)     max: 4538 Points
2999 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1260     avg: 1267     median: 1267 (53%)     max: 1274 Points
870 Points (37%)
min: 813     avg: 821     median: 824 (35%)     max: 826 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3395     avg: 3510     median: 3509.5 (6%)     max: 3624 Points
2944 Points (5%)
min: 2872     avg: 2933     median: 2929 (5%)     max: 2998 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5660     avg: 6074     median: 6074 (61%)     max: 6488 Points
3822 Points (38%)
min: 3758     avg: 3760     median: 3760 (38%)     max: 3762 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13776     avg: 14268     median: 14268 (16%)     max: 14760 Points
11172 Points (12%)
min: 11089     avg: 11342     median: 11342 (12%)     max: 11595 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3632     avg: 3641     median: 3640.5 (50%)     max: 3649 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10488     avg: 10675     median: 10674.5 (26%)     max: 10861 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10323     avg: 11834     median: 11833.5 (19%)     max: 13344 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2966     avg: 3441     median: 3440.5 (52%)     max: 3915 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 840.2     avg: 919     median: 919.1 (1%)     max: 998 ms
1102 ms (1%)
min: 1236.1     avg: 1456     median: 1335 (2%)     max: 1796.1 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 47776     avg: 48641     median: 48641 (44%)     max: 49506 Points
38966 Points (35%)
min: 24488     avg: 29797     median: 32109 (29%)     max: 32794 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 94     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (28%)     max: 103 Points
116 Points (33%)
min: 69     avg: 85     median: 93 (27%)     max: 93 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 115     avg: 122     median: 122 (25%)     max: 129 Points
151 Points (31%)
min: 102     avg: 115     median: 116 (24%)     max: 127 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 603046     avg: 749728     median: 749728 (45%)     max: 896410 Points
597212 Points (36%)
min: 553328     avg: 564791     median: 558781 (34%)     max: 582264 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 170029     avg: 206664     median: 206664 (57%)     max: 243298 Points
172629 Points (47%)
min: 138027     avg: 154764     median: 162368 (44%)     max: 163897 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 6225     avg: 6514     median: 6514 (1%)     max: 6803 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
39.7 MB/s (29%)
110%
1 QCM6490 +
43.8 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
570 MB/s (18%)
125%
1 QCM6490 +
714 MB/s (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
16 MB/s (20%)
155%
1 QCM6490 +
24.8 MB/s (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1627 MB/s (45%)
889 MB/s (25%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 23031     avg: 23802     median: 23801.5 (38%)     max: 24572 Points
26398 Points (42%)
min: 30076     avg: 30829     median: 30828.5 (49%)     max: 31581 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 10897     avg: 11361     median: 11360.5 (53%)     max: 11824 Points
11866 Points (55%)
min: 11662     avg: 13225     median: 12820 (59%)     max: 15194 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
6971 Points (37%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
11690 Points (76%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 935     avg: 945     median: 945 (36%)     max: 955 Points
794 Points (30%)
min: 730     avg: 741     median: 732 (28%)     max: 760 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.63     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (2%)     max: 5.62 Watt
100%
1 QCM6490 +
4.6 Watt (2%)
min: 4.05     avg: 4.6     median: 4.4 (2%)     max: 5.36 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.683     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.749 Watt
1.7 Watt (2%)
min: 0     avg: 0.9     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.58 Watt

Average Benchmarks Google Tensor G3 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm QCM6490 → 91% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G → 86% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 02. 01:21:01

#0 checking url part for id 15106 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15537 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14526 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.105s ... 0.106s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.106s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15106 +0.003s ... 0.109s

#8 got single benchmarks 15106 +0.015s ... 0.124s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15537 +0.003s ... 0.127s

#10 got single benchmarks 15537 +0.011s ... 0.138s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14526 +0.003s ... 0.141s

#12 got single benchmarks 14526 +0.016s ... 0.157s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.157s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.223s ... 0.38s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.38s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)