Notebookcheck Logo

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs HiSilicon Kirin 910T

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz

► remove from comparison  TCC8803 1GHz

ARM Mali 2D/3D graphics accelerator, DDR / DDR2 / LP-DDR2 / LP-DDR2 memory interface, LVDS Transmitter, HDMI 1.4, Composite TV-Out (NTSC / PAL), USB 2.0 HS OTG, USB 2.0 host, USB 1.1 HOST, EHI (External Host Interface), UART, NAND Flash Interface

Telechips' TCC88xx application processor will redefine the mobile device of tomorrow with new' innovative user experience by PC-like web browsing, 1080p full HD video record & playback, intuitive user interfaces, location based services and next generation social networking applications. TCC88xx supports development of planned features for the Tablet PC and HMP of tomorrow with tremendous performance and programmability to support new applications yet to be imagined. TCC88xx is equipped with hardwired VPU/GPU/ISP to maximize multimedia experience at its peak level.

 

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison  WM8950

The VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 is an entry-level SoC for smartphones and tablets. It is aimed at Android 4.x and Windows CE devices and includes a single core Cortex-A9 processor at 1 GHz, an ARM Mali 400 (MP2?) graphics card, multi-standard 1080p video decoding, H.264 video encoding, a DDR3, LPDDR2 memory controller and a hardware security engine.

HiSilicon Kirin 910T

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 910T is an ARM based quad core SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. As HiSilicon is fully owned by Huawei, the chip is mostly used in Huawei models like the MediaPad X1, P6 S, MediaPad M1 and Honor 3C 4G). The SoC integrates four Cortex-A9 cores (at 1.8 GHz max.), a ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU (at 533 MHz), a 32-bit single-channel LPDDR3-1600 memory controller (533 MHz) and a LTE Cat. 4 radio. The similar named HiSilicon Kirin 910 is a 200 MHz slower clocked (CPU) version.

At the time of announcement in mid 2014, the CPU performance of the Kirin910T is in the mid-range of smartphone and tablet SoCs. The power consumption is a bit higher than usual, as the CPU cores are rather high clocked.

ModelTelechips TCC8803 1GHzWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950HiSilicon Kirin 910T
Series
Series: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHzcores
Apple A61 GHzcores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T « 1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1000 MHz1000 MHz1800 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 14 / 4
Technology65 nm28 nm
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.tw
FeaturesARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
11572 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11485 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13330 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1796 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
599 Points (12%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
13.4 MFLOPS (1%)
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
83.2 MFLOPS (8%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
254 MFLOPS (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
16135 ms (19%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1043 ms (11%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
2775 Points (2%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
7189 points (17%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
23864 Points (56%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
584 Iter./s (18%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
13307 Iter./s (44%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
12178 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks Telechips TCC8803 1GHz → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 280% n=1

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910T → 622% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 15. 15:21:32

#0 checking url part for id 3327 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6191 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:39:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.155s ... 0.156s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.157s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3327 +0.003s ... 0.16s

#8 got single benchmarks 3327 +0.008s ... 0.167s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.003s ... 0.17s

#10 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.008s ... 0.178s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 6191 +0.003s ... 0.181s

#12 got single benchmarks 6191 +0.008s ... 0.189s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.189s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.246s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.246s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)