Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300

► remove from comparison Intel T4300

The Intel Pentium T4300 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4300) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T4300 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. 

Intel® Pentium® Processors do not support the following features:

  • Intel® Virtualization Technology
  • Intel® Dynamic Acceleration
  • Intel® Dynamic FSB Frequency Switching
  • C3E
  • Deeper Sleep State (C4)
  • Intel® Enhanced Deeper Sleep State

Therefore, the power consumption in idle mode should be a bit above similar clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs. Furtheremore, virtualization technology VT-x is also not available for the T4300.

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T4300 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Sumpreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4300 should be sufficient.

The Pentium T4300 is based on the Intel Penryn core and features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-step pipeline. 

Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium SU4100 is an entry level dual-core processor for subnotebooks. It is based on the Penryn core, but may feature less power saving functions due to the Pentium brand. The slow clock speed qualifies the CPU only for less demanding tasks.

show full text
ModelIntel Pentium Dual Core T4300Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Pentium Dual Core
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Pentium Dual Core Penryn
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 « 2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU41001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T43002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 « 1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2100 MHz1300 MHz
FSB800800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt10 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm, 1.05-1.15V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
SocketPGA478BGA956
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit, iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTIntel64, Enhanced Speedstep, ExBit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2153     avg: 2243     median: 2242 (14%)     max: 2335 Points
min: 1303     avg: 1432     median: 1409 (9%)     max: 1552 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3963     avg: 4148     median: 4057 (3%)     max: 4425 Points
min: 2639     avg: 2728     median: 2670.5 (2%)     max: 2873 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4415 Points (3%)
2881 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
2040 Points (2%)
1542 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1252 s (15%)
min: 1986     avg: 3179     median: 3754 (44%)     max: 3796 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
39 s (8%)
min: 62     avg: 90.2     median: 90.2 (18%)     max: 118.6 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1692     avg: 1798     median: 1825 (4%)     max: 1848 Points
min: 1110     avg: 1158     median: 1168.5 (2%)     max: 1183 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 25.3     median: 26 (6%)     max: 28 s
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (9%)     max: 41 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 62.3     median: 64 (3%)     max: 69 s
min: 89     avg: 93     median: 94 (4%)     max: 95 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1341     avg: 1469     median: 1528 (7%)     max: 1539 s
min: 2073     avg: 2114     median: 2103.5 (9%)     max: 2175 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 17767     avg: 18550     median: 18550 (9%)     max: 19333 MIPS
min: 11957     avg: 12003     median: 11963 (6%)     max: 12127 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 13927     avg: 14231     median: 14231 (11%)     max: 14535 MFLOPS
min: 8467     avg: 9129     median: 9240.5 (7%)     max: 9566 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 SU4100 +
min: 3108     avg: 3274     median: 3274 (7%)     max: 3440 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 5.3     avg: 5.4     median: 5.4 (69%)     max: 5.4 Points
min: 3.9     avg: 4     median: 4 (51%)     max: 4 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T4300 +
min: 3590     avg: 3788     median: 3787.5 (3%)     max: 3985 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 → 76% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 10:43:43

#0 checking url part for id 490 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 504 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 490 +0.003s ... 0.014s

#7 got single benchmarks 490 +0.034s ... 0.048s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 504 +0.003s ... 0.051s

#9 got single benchmarks 504 +0.05s ... 0.101s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.101s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.096s ... 0.197s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.222s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)