Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300

► remove from comparison Intel T3300

The Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is a entry-level dual core laptop processor. It is based on the Penryn Core but features less power saving features as the Pentium or Core 2 Duo CPUs. Technically the Celeron T3300 is a stripped down Pentium T4200 and therefore the performance should be on the same level. 

Still the Celeron T3300 may no support Enhanced Speedstep (and other techniques), therefore the average power consumption should be higher leading to a lower battery runtime.

The performance of the entry level dual-core CPU should be sufficient for office, Internet normal image processing. Demanding tasks like intensive 3D gaming, HD video cutting, or rendering will be limited by the performance of the Celeron T3300.

The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is delivered in a 478-Pin FCPGA Package and fits in the Socket P for laptops.

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500

► remove from comparison Intel T3500

The Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a entry-level dual core laptop processor. It is based on the Penryn Core but features less power saving features as the Pentium or Core 2 Duo CPUs. Technically the Celeron T3500 is a stripped down Pentium T4300 and therefore the performance should be on the same level. 

Still the Celeron T3500 may no support Enhanced Speedstep (and other techniques), therefore the average power consumption should be higher leading to a lower battery runtime.

The performance of the entry level dual-core CPU should be sufficient for office, Internet normal image processing. Demanding tasks like intensive 3D gaming, HD video cutting, or rendering will be limited by the performance of the Celeron T3500.

ModelIntel Celeron Dual-Core T3300Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-Core
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Celeron Dual-Core Penryn
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T35002.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T33002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100 compare1.9 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T35002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T33002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100 compare1.9 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2100 MHz
FSB800800
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
SocketSocket P 478Socket P PGA478
FeaturesSSE4.1, EM64T, Execute Disable BitSSE4.1, EM64T, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors410 Million
Die Size107 mm2
$80 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T3500 +
2063 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T3500 +
4098 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T3500 +
1229 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T3500 +
38.5 s (8%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 T3300 +
39.9 s (21%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T3500 +
1760 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
28.6 s (6%)
27.3 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T3500 +
68.1 s (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T3500 +
18000 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T3500 +
15450 MFLOPS (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 → 100% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 20. 10:29:37

#0 checking url part for id 568 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1285 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 568 +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 got single benchmarks 568 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 1285 +0s ... 0.013s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#17 got single benchmarks 1285 +0.007s ... 0.021s

#18 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#30 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.024s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#32 return log +0.004s ... 0.028s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)