Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300

► remove from comparison Intel T3300

The Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is a entry-level dual core laptop processor. It is based on the Penryn Core but features less power saving features as the Pentium or Core 2 Duo CPUs. Technically the Celeron T3300 is a stripped down Pentium T4200 and therefore the performance should be on the same level. 

Still the Celeron T3300 may no support Enhanced Speedstep (and other techniques), therefore the average power consumption should be higher leading to a lower battery runtime.

The performance of the entry level dual-core CPU should be sufficient for office, Internet normal image processing. Demanding tasks like intensive 3D gaming, HD video cutting, or rendering will be limited by the performance of the Celeron T3300.

The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is delivered in a 478-Pin FCPGA Package and fits in the Socket P for laptops.

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500

► remove from comparison Intel T3500

The Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a entry-level dual core laptop processor. It is based on the Penryn Core but features less power saving features as the Pentium or Core 2 Duo CPUs. Technically the Celeron T3500 is a stripped down Pentium T4300 and therefore the performance should be on the same level. 

Still the Celeron T3500 may no support Enhanced Speedstep (and other techniques), therefore the average power consumption should be higher leading to a lower battery runtime.

The performance of the entry level dual-core CPU should be sufficient for office, Internet normal image processing. Demanding tasks like intensive 3D gaming, HD video cutting, or rendering will be limited by the performance of the Celeron T3500.

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100

► remove from comparison Intel T3100

The Intel Celeron T3100 or Celeron Dual-Core T3100 is an entry level dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the 45nm Penryn core but features only 1MB Level 2 cache and many functions of the core are disabled. Only the 64 Bit extensions and the Execute Disable Bit can be used. Hardware Virtualization functions, Intel Enhanced Speedstep and other power saving features are disabled leading to a higher power consumption than a similar Core 2 Duo / Pentium processor.

The performance of the T3100 is only suited for less demanding tasks like Office, Web, entry level image manipulation and SD video cutting. For demanding games, the T3100 delivers too less performance.

ModelIntel Celeron Dual-Core T3300Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-Core
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Series: Celeron Dual-Core Penryn
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T35002.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T33002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T31001.9 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU23001.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T35002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T33002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T31001.9 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU23001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T35002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T33002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T31001.9 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU23001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2100 MHz1900 MHz
FSB800800800
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
45 nm45 nm45 nm1.00-1.250V
SocketSocket P 478Socket P PGA478BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesSSE4.1, EM64T, Execute Disable BitSSE4.1, EM64T, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
$80 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Celeron Dual-Core T3500Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
max. Temp.105 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T3500 +
2063 Points (18%)
92%
1 T3100 +
1900 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T3500 +
4098 Points (6%)
91%
1 T3100 +
3740 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T3500 +
1229 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T3500 +
38.5 s (8%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 T3300 +
39.9 s (21%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T3500 +
1760 Points (4%)
96%
1 T3100 +
1687 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
28.6 s (6%)
27.3 s (6%)
29.8 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T3500 +
68.1 s (3%)
100%
1 T3100 +
71 s (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T3500 +
18000 MIPS (9%)
90%
1 T3100 +
16260 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T3500 +
15450 MFLOPS (12%)
85%
1 T3100 +
13200 MFLOPS (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100 → 100% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 04. 05:36:54

#0 checking url part for id 568 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1285 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 618 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.011s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#13 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#14 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 568 +0s ... 0.012s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#17 got single benchmarks 568 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 1285 +0s ... 0.017s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#20 got single benchmarks 1285 +0.007s ... 0.024s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 618 +0s ... 0.025s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#23 got single benchmarks 618 +0.005s ... 0.03s

#24 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#43 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.035s

#44 return log +0s ... 0.036s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)