Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370

Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium T3200 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T3200) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T3200 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. It is based on the older Merom core (compared to the T4200 that is based on the Penryn core).

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T3200 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Sumpreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4200 should be sufficient.

 

Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium Dual-Core T2370 is an entry level dual-core processor that was announced in 2008. It is based on the old Merom core with some deactivated features (power saving, Virtualization). Due to the low clock rate, the slow FSB, and the small level 2 cache, the performance is only suited for non-demanding tasks.

show full text
ModelIntel Pentium Dual Core T3200Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Pentium Dual Core
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Pentium Dual Core Merom
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23701.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2330 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T32002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370 « 1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2330 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 MHz1730 MHz
FSB667533
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm, 1.075-1.175
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation)MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, EIST, XD-Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
SocketPPGA478

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T2370 +
min: 1556     avg: 1601     median: 1600.5 (10%)     max: 1645 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3600 Points (3%)
min: 3030     avg: 3063     median: 3062.5 (2%)     max: 3095 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T2370 +
min: 1393     avg: 1422     median: 1422.5 (3%)     max: 1450 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T2370 +
36.4 s (8%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T2370 +
min: 3370     avg: 3837     median: 3836.5 (8%)     max: 4303 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370 → 85% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 04. 10:58:13

#0 checking url part for id 443 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 389 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.017s ... 0.018s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 443 +0.003s ... 0.021s

#7 got single benchmarks 443 +0.036s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 389 +0.003s ... 0.059s

#9 got single benchmarks 389 +0.017s ... 0.077s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.099s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.122s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)