Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Duo T2250 vs Intel Core Duo U2500 vs Intel Core Duo T2350

Intel Core Duo T2250

► remove from comparison

Intel Core Duo U2500

► remove from comparison

Intel Core Duo T2350

► remove from comparison

ModelIntel Core Duo T2250Intel Core Duo U2500Intel Core Duo T2350
SeriesIntel Core DuoIntel Core DuoIntel Core Duo
CodenameYonahYonahYonah
Series: Core Duo Yonah
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2250 « 1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U25001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U2500 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2350 « 1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U25001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1700 MHz1200 MHz1860 MHz
FSB533533533
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP31 Watt9 Watt31 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1537 Points (9%)
1074 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2884 Points (2%)
2021 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1405 Points (3%)
922 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 38.86     avg: 38.9     median: 38.9 (192%)     max: 20.2 s
min: 49     avg: 49     median: 49 (243%)     max: 20.2 s
min: 35     avg: 35     median: 35 (173%)     max: 20.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 87     avg: 87     median: 87 (338%)     max: 25.703 s
min: 120     avg: 120     median: 120 (467%)     max: 25.703 s
min: 82     avg: 82     median: 82 (319%)     max: 25.703 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2628     avg: 2628     median: 2628 (301%)     max: 873.522 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2700     avg: 2811.7     median: 2724 (6%)     max: 3011 Points
min: 1962     avg: 1985     median: 1985 (4%)     max: 2008 Points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 38.86>20.2 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.072s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 49>20.2 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.074s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 35>20.2 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.075s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 87>25.703 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.076s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 120>25.703 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.078s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 82>25.703 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.079s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2628>873.522 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.08s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 11796> for benchmark 10, setting:2277 +0s ... 0.082s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 8178> for benchmark 10, setting:2277 +0s ... 0.083s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 8619> for benchmark 11, setting:2278 +0s ... 0.084s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 6009> for benchmark 11, setting:2278 +0s ... 0.085s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5201> for benchmark 15, setting:18 +0s ... 0.087s

log 04. 05:41:00

#0 checking url part for id 175 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 349 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 330 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.01s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 175 +0.002s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 175 +0.028s ... 0.04s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 349 +0.002s ... 0.042s

#10 got single benchmarks 349 +0.008s ... 0.05s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 330 +0.002s ... 0.052s

#12 got single benchmarks 330 +0.009s ... 0.062s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.063s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.065s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.067s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.068s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.07s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.071s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.072s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.074s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.075s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.076s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.078s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.079s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.08s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.082s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.083s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.084s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.085s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.087s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.088s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.09s

#34 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.09s

#35 return log +0s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)