Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300

Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500

► remove

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 is a power efficient single core processor for small subnotebooks. It is based on the Penryn architecture and offers all features of this core (Virtualization, C6 state, Dynamic Acceleration).

The performance of the single core ULV processor is compareable to a Atom 330 dual core at 1.6 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K125 single core at 1.7 GHz. However, both competitor are rated at a higher TDP. Therfore, the performance falls in the slowest category and especially due to the missing second core, the multi-threading performance can be disappointing. 

With a TDP rating of 5.5 Watt (1.01 Watt minimum in Deep Power-Down mode and 12.53 Watt maximum), the CPU is one of the most power efficient mobile processors (of 2009) and suited for small and light subnotebooks.

Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300

► remove

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is a power efficient single core processor for small subnotebooks. It is based on the Penryn architecture and offers all features of this core (Virtualization, C6 state, Dynamic Acceleration).

Due to the slow clock speed of 1.2 GHz, the performance of the single core ULV processor is only between a high clocked single core Atom CPU (N470 e.g.) and a dual core Atom (330, e.g.).

Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300
Intel Core 2 SoloIntel Core 2 Solo
PenrynPenryn
: Core 2 Solo Penryn
» Intel Core 2 Solo SU35001400 MHz1 / 1
Intel Core 2 Solo SU33001200 MHz1 / 1
Intel Core 2 Solo SU35001400 MHz1 / 1
» Intel Core 2 Solo SU33001200 MHz1 / 1
1400 MHz1200 MHz
800800
64 KB
3 MB3 MB
1 / 11 / 1
5.5 5.5
410 410
45 1.050V-1.150V45 1.05-1.15V
107 mm2107 mm2
100 °C100 °C
BGA956BGA956
Enhanced Speedstep, VT, TXT, SSE4.1, Dynamic AccelerationEnhanced Speedstep, Virtualization VT-x, TXT, Idle States
$262 U.S.$262 U.S.
Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300

Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 1153     avg: 1426.3     median: 1468 (16%)     max: 1511 Points
1247 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
1247 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
min: 3643     avg: 3676     median: 3667 (43%)     max: 3717 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
min: 109     avg: 126.9     median: 112 (23%)     max: 174 seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 587     avg: 648.9     median: 655 (4%)     max: 668 Points
564 Points (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - Standard 1280x768 1280x768
min: 648     avg: 650     median: 648 (21%)     max: 654 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 33.4     median: 35 (8%)     max: 37 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 76.8     median: 82 (4%)     max: 88 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1441     avg: 1822     median: 1916 (9%)     max: 2014 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 3664     avg: 5754.8     median: 6442 (3%)     max: 6471 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 2928     avg: 4571     median: 5117 (4%)     max: 5122 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 1987     avg: 2255.8     median: 2283 (14%)     max: 2678 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - CPU
3.5 Points (50%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
3.3 points (47%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300 → 90%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)