Notebookcheck Logo

Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 vs Texas Instruments OMAP 4470

Texas Instruments OMAP 4460

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4460

The OMAP 4460 is a fourth generation SoC (System on Chip) developed by Texas Instruments (TI) for use in mobile phones and tablets. The 45 nm chip includes dual ARM Cortex-A9 CPU cores running at 1.2 GHz up to 1.5 GHz on an ARM v7 instruction set and ARM NEON SIMD (Single instruction, multiple data) engine. 

The SoC integrates an SGX540 GPU from PowerVR clocked at 384 MHz, which can utilize the same 400 MHz dual-channel LPDDR2 memory controller as the two core processors. Compared to the OMAP 4430, the 4460 is clocked higher on both the CPU and GPU.

The OMAP 4460 is found in a small number of tablets and smartphones, most notably the Samsung Galaxy Nexus and the Amazon Kindle Fire HD 7. In terms of raw processing and GPU power, the SoC is more in line with the Nvidia Tegra 2 than the Tegra 3. The integrated SGX540 is an older generation of graphics that has been largely superceded by the much more powerful SGX543 as found in the third generation iPad.

Texas Instruments OMAP 4470

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4470

The OMAP 4470 is a fourth generation SoC (System on Chip) developed by Texas Instruments (TI) for use in mobile phones and tablets. The 45 nm chip includes dual ARM Cortex-A9 CPU cores running at 1.3 GHz up to 1.8 GHz on an ARM v7 instruction set and ARM NEON SIMD (Single instruction, multiple data) engine. 

The SoC integrates an SGX540 GPU from PowerVR clocked at 277 - 384 MHz, which can utilize the same 400 MHz dual-channel LPDDR2 memory controller as the two core processors. Compared to the OMAP 4430, the 4470 is clocked higher on both the CPU and GPU.

ModelTexas Instruments OMAP 4460Texas Instruments OMAP 4470
Series
CodenameCortex A9Cortex A9
Series: Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Apple A5 compare1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44601.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Apple A5 compare1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Clock1200 MHz1500 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP0.6 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
FeaturesDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal ProcessorDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal Processor
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
796 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
427 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 418     avg: 426     median: 426 (3%)     max: 434 Points
min: 436     avg: 438     median: 438 (4%)     max: 440 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1123     avg: 1207     median: 1206.5 (11%)     max: 1290 Points
min: 1302     avg: 1326     median: 1325.5 (12%)     max: 1349 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1573     avg: 1730     median: 1730 (3%)     max: 1887 Points
min: 1895     avg: 1929     median: 1929 (4%)     max: 1963 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 917     avg: 1013     median: 1013 (2%)     max: 1109 Points
min: 1118     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (2%)     max: 1153 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1137     avg: 1244     median: 1243.5 (3%)     max: 1350 Points
min: 1367     avg: 1381     median: 1381 (4%)     max: 1395 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 73.8     avg: 75.2     median: 75.2 (3%)     max: 76.6 MFLOPS
min: 80.5     avg: 87.6     median: 87.6 (3%)     max: 94.6 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 44.38     avg: 48.6     median: 48.6 (5%)     max: 52.9 MFLOPS
min: 52.5     avg: 55.4     median: 55.4 (5%)     max: 58.3 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1096 ms (12%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1102     avg: 1445     median: 1444.5 (14%)     max: 1787 ms
min: 1438     avg: 1497     median: 1497 (14%)     max: 1556 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 2226     avg: 2586     median: 2585.5 (6%)     max: 2945 points
min: 2747     avg: 3447     median: 3447 (8%)     max: 4147 points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
12347 Points (29%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
224 Iter./s (7%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
5481 Iter./s (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
5787 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 → 112% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 13:24:41

#0 checking url part for id 3601 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3647 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.109s ... 0.11s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.11s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3601 +0.004s ... 0.113s

#7 got single benchmarks 3601 +0.013s ... 0.126s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3647 +0.003s ... 0.129s

#9 got single benchmarks 3647 +0.009s ... 0.138s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.138s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.194s

#12 return log +0.031s ... 0.225s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)