Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.4
Average of 1 scores (from 2 reviews)
Reviews for the Nokia C3
Source: The Mobile Indian
The Nokia C3 does want to capture the budget market but in our opinion it fails to do so as the competition provides much better value for a much lesser price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/01/2020
Source: NDTV Gadgets
I think it's pretty apparent by now that the Nokia C3 doesn't offer the best value for money, especially the 3GB variant that's priced at Rs. 8,999. I think the Realme Narzo 10A (Review) or even the Narzo 20A, which we're currently testing, would be much better alternatives. Apart from decent build quality and a clean Android experience, the Nokia C3 doesn't have enough going in its favour to justify this price. The performance is middling, battery life is weak, cameras aren't good, and it looks a bit old-fashioned.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322: Entry level graphics card based on the PowerVR Rogue architecture with support for OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
SC9863A: Entry level octa core SoC with 8 ARM Cortex-A55 cores in two clusters. One performance cluster with up to 1.6 GHz and a efficiency cluster with up to 1.2 GHz. The SoC also integrates an LTE modem, a IMG8322 GPU and 1080p video support.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This display is quite big for a smartphone but frequently used for smartphones.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
Nokia: The Finnish enterprise is one of the most important telecommunication companies and well-known for mobile technologies. The company started with netbooks in 2009.
60%: Such a bad rating is rare. There exist hardly any notebooks, which are rated worse.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.