Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N435 vs HiSilicon Kirin 910T

Intel Atom N435

► remove from comparison Intel N435

The Intel Atom N435 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2/DDR3 main memory and the GMA 3150 graphics card

The performance of the whole system (Atom N435 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing, multitasking and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance of the CPU is on a level with the slow Atom Z520.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 5 Watt TDP). Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks and thin laptops.

HiSilicon Kirin 910T

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 910T is an ARM based quad core SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. As HiSilicon is fully owned by Huawei, the chip is mostly used in Huawei models like the MediaPad X1, P6 S, MediaPad M1 and Honor 3C 4G). The SoC integrates four Cortex-A9 cores (at 1.8 GHz max.), a ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU (at 533 MHz), a 32-bit single-channel LPDDR3-1600 memory controller (533 MHz) and a LTE Cat. 4 radio. The similar named HiSilicon Kirin 910 is a 200 MHz slower clocked (CPU) version.

At the time of announcement in mid 2014, the CPU performance of the Kirin910T is in the mid-range of smartphone and tablet SoCs. The power consumption is a bit higher than usual, as the CPU cores are rather high clocked.

ModelIntel Atom N435HiSilicon Kirin 910T
SeriesIntel Atom
CodenamePinetrailCortex-A9
Series: Cortex-A9
Intel Atom D525 compare1.8 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N455 compare1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N450 compare1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N435 « 1.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T « 1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1333 MHz1800 MHz
FSB533
L2 Cache512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 24 / 4
TDP5 Watt
Technology45 nm28 nm
SocketFCBGA559
Featuresintegrated DDR2/DDR3 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, HyperthreadingARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)
Architecturex86ARM
Announced

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
11572 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11485 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13330 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1796 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
599 Points (12%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
254 MFLOPS (9%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
83.2 MFLOPS (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
16135 ms (19%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1043 ms (11%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
2775 Points (2%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
7189 points (17%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
23864 Points (56%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
584 Iter./s (18%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
13307 Iter./s (44%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
12178 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910T → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 00:29:05

#0 checking url part for id 2692 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6191 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.06s ... 0.06s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.061s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2692 +0.003s ... 0.063s

#7 got single benchmarks 2692 +0.008s ... 0.071s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6191 +0.003s ... 0.074s

#9 got single benchmarks 6191 +0.009s ... 0.083s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.083s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.052s ... 0.135s

#12 return log +0.029s ... 0.164s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)